|
|
Baugruppe Now
Šťastná, Anna ; Císler, Ondřej (referee) ; Hora, Jan (advisor)
Baugruppe, as an alternative option for housing, is made up of a group of people who are looking for a way to create their own housing according to their ideas. They become developers themselves, looking for interesting solutions for their housing that the regular real estate market does not offer. Together, they find land that is often less attractive to ordinary developers and compromise to decide on all the design steps. For the proposed Baugruppe, the site is situated in the town Znojmo, Czech republic. The plots were chosen in such a way that they did not have any particular qualities - on the contrary, that they were rather places that were not at first sight very attractive. The theme of the work is to portray the Baugruppe way of living as community housing. The proposal seeks to figure out a way to make community coexistence as natural as possible for all Baugruppe participants. Whether just meeting the neighbors on the way to their apartments, meeting on the terrace with a friend from the opposite apartment or organizing an event in the common interior/exterior spaces for all Baugruppe participants. All these spaces create a slightly different atmosphere and become a combination of different small worlds that intertwine with each other. At the same time, the aim of the work is to create a house that opens up to its surroundings while allowing all the events of the house to take place undisturbed inside.
|
|
|
Cohousing as a Development Project
Orlová, Lenka ; Vařechová, Martina (referee) ; Hlavinková, Vítězslava (advisor)
This master's thesis deals with a type of community living called cohousing. Describes typical attributes, residential differences and possibilities of ownership legal forms. In more detail deals with a formation of cohousing as a development project. Practical part of this thesis device the real cohousing and evaluates conditions of the sale according to the real estate market situation.
|
|
|
City within City
Menšíková, Kateřina ; Žalmanová, Petra (referee) ; Nový, Vítězslav (advisor)
The bachelor thesis deals with the design of a set of residential buildings based on the cohousing principle. The proposed buildings consist of three apartment buildings intended for community housing of three social groups - seniors, students and young families. The design works with varying degrees of privacy and is based on a classic urban block typical for the area. It leaves the public parter as the street character, creating a platform. On the higher floors above the platform, the area is open and allows the greenery to pervade from the opposite side to the courtyard. The opening of the area creates better conditions for housing and also a semi-private space at the level of common floors of community housing. This space is a continuation of a semi-public park, serving as a background for cohousing and kindergarten.
|
|
|
Kopřivnice – Housing along Kopřivnička
Kóňová, Patrícia ; Mašek, Radomír (referee) ; Marek, Jiří (advisor)
The prefabricated apartment buildings are on the west bank of the river and family houses on the east bank of the river. On the east side there are private areas of family houses and on the west side there are prefabricated buildings with poor quality public spaces. There is only the anonymity of the city, isolation and a lack of human dimension. My concept solves the problem of combining two opposing approaches. It emphasizes neighborly relations in the form of community and the development of community thinking. What should urbanism that unites people look like?
|
|
|
Residential Complex in Brno - Komín
Preininger, Petr ; Vrbka, Jan (referee) ; Makovský, Zdeněk (advisor)
The locality is one of the most desired in the city of Brno and its outskirts. My goal was to create an enclosed city block (a district in a district), where the neighbours know each other and therefore create a strong community. To ensure some degree of privacy I have divided the continuous longitudinal house block, which highlights the descend of the land, into separated groups of 3 to 6 terraced houses. To the groups I have then assigned shared gardens which together give impression of being one unit. The plot itself has the biggest value in todays state. The end of the village seamlessly turns into forrest which makes up for a barrier of some sort. The quality of the location lays in the contact with the forrest. That is the reason why I have decided to lower the building area under the visual horizon and keep the gardening colony, although on the roofs of the buildings.
|
|
|
Baugruppe Now
Drbalová, Eva ; Brůhová, Alžběta (referee) ; Hora, Jan (advisor)
The bachelor's thesis deals with the design of a multifunctional structure based on the Baugruppe, where the developer is replaced by 12 households with a vision of community housing. The concept of the shape is based on the idea of finding shared interspaces in a line development. The object consists of five masses that are in the individual floors connected and interrupted by balconies, balconies and loggias and in such a condition that a number of situations arise.
|
|
|
Romany Housing
Chylíková, Zuzana ; Janok, Jakub (referee) ; Sátora, Josef (advisor) ; Petříček, Tomáš (advisor)
The Bachelors thesis is based on a previous college project "public-asistance dwelings with Romany culture elements". Scheduled plot is situated in Maloměřice a Obřany city quarter of Brno. There was designed terrace development consisting of two-storey family houses and single-storey „starting units“. Concept uses straw-bale building technology which is suitable technology for self-building. Applicants for inhabitation are building together their new houses - houses they would understand. During construction work new social relations between incoming inhabitants are coming up. This should positively influence their future co-living. Houses layout offers sufficiency of privacy, however there is enough space for community sharing as well.
|
|
|
Living in Intensive Urban Structures
Zadražilová, Miroslava ; Urbášková, Hana (referee) ; Šimeček, Pavel (referee) ; Vitková, Lubica (referee) ; Menšíková, Naděžda (advisor)
As a result of changes in the society, such as the increasing mobility, increasing spatial demandindgness of inhabitants and the onset of digital technologies, the architects and urbanists have been searching for new ways of urban housing developments. One of these ways is densification, i.e. an intensive use of the urban space. An intensive urban structure uses up the potential of a place to its maximum, solves several issues simultaneously and is a functional hybrid, the home of potential suburbanizers and a place of social contacts. It comes from the efforts to solve the particular issue of an over-populated, collapsing city. The aim of the thesis is to show contemporary approaches to the issue of intensive urban structures and to map out both the built and unbuilt projects. The thesis creates a system of their categorization and taxonomy. There is always a mixture of functions in play from the functional perspective. One can distinguish five categories according to the spacial conception. These categories are as follows: multiplicity, porousness, hybridity, connectivity and verticality. The public and semi-public spaces thus move to the higher levels of the city, into the city level, urban balcony or the hybrid landscape. The built projects usually tend to be impulses, in relation to the original city, to develop and revitalize the devastated city areas, brownfields, even urban sprawls. Based on the findings of this thesis, diploma and pre-diploma project assignments have been created at the architecture department at FAST VUT in Brno and the approaches to the issue have been tested in the pedagogical process. The survey in the second part of the thesis looks for the answer to the question of whether the potential inhabitants of an intensive urban structure exist, and who these people might be.
|
|
|
Garden city
Haasová, Lenka ; Zezula, Adam (referee) ; Toman, Radek (advisor)
Housing cannot be simplified to its sole function of living. It must be extended to the relationship to its place and environment. What is the relationship of a person (inhabitant) to the space of his living? How to live? How to live differently? What is housing today and what can be predicted of its development? How can we, the architects, seek a solution to this seemingly banal housing problem in the current context? In the new territory of the South Center of Brno, in connection with the new railway station, large areas have been freed up, which make it possible to organize the urban structure of the new stop. The garden city is one of its designed parts. The new housing environment is offered in the expansion of the city center in the scale of the city district. Living in a garden city is not only a link to natural elements but also an opportunity to restore direct relations to the place of work and to the place of living and other forms of urban living. The work is based on an urban study prepared by the association Ivan Koleček - Pavel Jura architects Lausanne - Brno.
|
|
|
Housing neighbourhood at Brno-Líšeň
Uřídilová, Valentýna ; Hybská, Bohumila (referee) ; Nový, Vítězslav (advisor)
The solved area with an area of approximately 4.2 hectares is the eastern part of the statutory city of Brno. It is located in the city of Brno Líšeň on the border of a row of village character with a small scale (old Líšeň) and loose construction of point, board and typified high-rise houses from the 20th century (new Líšeň). The aim of the project is to find a dialogue between the loose structure of the new Líšeň and the town-building structure of the old one. With its masses it creates clearly defined streets and spaces. At the same time, there is an effort to loosen the mass and to integrate it into the near nature with its form. The idea design is based on the principle of cohousing (community housing), which is designed for living in family houses and apartment buildings. The main idea of the project is to respond to today's individualized and automated time, when construction has ceased to focus on the formation of shared spaces = interpersonal relationships, it increasing anonymity and isolation. Basic social interactions, mutually beneficial relations between neighbors are disappearing. It is also a response to the disintegration of the traditional family and can replace family background. In the architectural form it also solves the issue of uniformity, the loss of human scale in modern construction. The emphasis in the project is on the diversity of types of apartments and on a diverse range of public, semi-public, semi-private and private spaces.
|
guest ::
