|
|
Hegel, Schopenhauer and Nietzsche in the work Nationalism by D. Dontsov
Dovhoruk, Ivanna ; Barša, Pavel (advisor) ; Znoj, Milan (referee)
Title: Hegel, Schopenhauer and Nietzsche in the work Nationalism by D. Dontsov Author: Mgr. Ivanna Dovhoruk Department: The Department of Political Science Supervisor: prof. Dr. Pavel Barša, M.A., Ph.D. Abstract This master thesis provides a political-philosophical inquiry of the treatise called ,,Nationalism" (Націоналізм; 1926) written by the ideologist of Ukrainian nationalism Dmytro Dontsov (Дмитро Донцов; 1883-1973), in which he conceptualizes his own theory of active nationalism (чинний націоналізм). Dontsov argues that the idea of a nation consists in the national will (воля нації), and introduces the concept of the will primarily with regard to the concepts of three German philosophers - G. W. F. Hegel (substantieller Wille), Arthur Schopenhauer (Wille zum Leben), and Friedrich Nietzsche (Wille zur Macht). In this inquiry we shall address the question of how Dmytro Dontsov worked philosophically with different notions of will of two different wings of German thought, and what conclusions can be drawn from the theory of nationalism, which is based on the philosophical concept. The first and second chapters are merely preparatory. The third chapter represents reading of Nationalism on the one hand, and the related works of Hegel, Schopenhauer, and Nietzsche on the other. The fourth chapter shall be...
|
|
|
The Sophists as seen by Plato and Aristotle, and their reappraisal by Hegel
Dovhoruk, Ivanna ; Thein, Karel (advisor) ; Jinek, Jakub (referee)
This work is an inquiry of the original traces of negative and positive criticism of the sophists. Through the interpretation of the relevant passages in selected works of Plato, Aristotle and Hegel we will try to seize the main reasons that have led these thinkers to the rejection of sophistry, or for its appreciation. Thence, there will not be taken into account the Sophists as a philosophical phenomenon, but what Plato, Aristotle and Hegel say about them. At the same time we give up all criticism and evaluation, because we do not want to seek advantages and disadvantages of these opinions; we just want to know what they are. The first chapter includes four interpretations of Plato's dialogues Protagoras, Gorgias, Sophist and Euthydemus. In the second chapter we will try through the Aristotle's reading of the first fifteen chapters of his writings Sophistical Refutations seize the reasons for his adverse assessment of the Sophists. The third chapter examines Hegel's appreciation of sophistry, which results from his conception of the history of philosophy as a necessary process of evolution in his Lectures on the History of Philosophy. In the conclusion the results of inquiry and overall summary will be presented.
|
|
|
An Enquiry Concerning the Phenomenon of Maidan Through the Application of the Hegelian Lordship and Bondage Theory
Dovhoruk, Ivanna ; Karfíková, Lenka (advisor) ; Matějčková, Tereza (referee)
This thesis is concerned with the question how can be the phenomenon of Maidan (Майдан) understood. Maidan here is primarly seen as an event in which people risked their lives. The first chapter deals with eyewitness testimonies of demonstrators in the Ukrainian Revolution of Dignity (Революція Гідності), who were present in the directly life-threatening places (Hrushevsky-st, Institutska-st). In the second chapter Hegel's concept of the certification by death (die Bewährung durch den Tod) is inquired, as present in a lordship and bondage theory (Herrschaft und Knechtschaft) in the Phenomenology of Spirit (Phänomenologie des Geistes). In the third chapter, through the presentation of the author's own speculative theory of the Gates, we will try to prove that life can be deployed in two ways, from a position of humility and a position of pride. Within proving this statement we differentiate Hegelian concept of certification by death using Augustine's notion of pride (superbia). At the end of the inquiry we will try to answer the initial quastion, what Maidan is in light of the act of deployment of life.
|
|
|
The Sophists as seen by Plato and Aristotle, and their reappraisal by Hegel
Dovhoruk, Ivanna ; Thein, Karel (advisor) ; Jinek, Jakub (referee)
This work is an inquiry of the original traces of negative and positive criticism of the sophists. Through the interpretation of the relevant passages in selected works of Plato, Aristotle and Hegel we will try to seize the main reasons that have led these thinkers to the rejection of sophistry, or for its appreciation. Thence, there will not be taken into account the Sophists as a philosophical phenomenon, but what Plato, Aristotle and Hegel say about them. At the same time we give up all criticism and evaluation, because we do not want to seek advantages and disadvantages of these opinions; we just want to know what they are. The first chapter includes four interpretations of Plato's dialogues Protagoras, Gorgias, Sophist and Euthydemus. In the second chapter we will try through the Aristotle's reading of the first fifteen chapters of his writings Sophistical Refutations seize the reasons for his adverse assessment of the Sophists. The third chapter examines Hegel's appreciation of sophistry, which results from his conception of the history of philosophy as a necessary process of evolution in his Lectures on the History of Philosophy. In the conclusion the results of inquiry and overall summary will be presented.
|
guest ::
