|
| |
|
|
Revitalization Program of Floral Garden in Kromeriz
Doležel, Martin ; Sochor, Jan (referee) ; Ponešová, Barbora (advisor)
THE GARDEN IN A CRISIS The first problem. Moving the entrance from the rotunda axis in the north to the area where the farmyard surrounded by greenhouses is situated. The consequence of this step was destruction of the conception of a floral garden and further, confusion of a visitor caused by the new and excentric garden entrance. The second problem. The original noble fill of the forefield has been perfectly cleaned, including the structure. Therefore the courtyard of honour is wedged in the two huge unspecific areas. The third problem. The nineteenth century is gone. Nowadays visitor is hard to please and unconcentrated. THE CONCEPTION Revitalisation and amendment of the forefield structure concept in subareas is both practical and it offers the esthetic quality which was lost. In relation to the axis of the garden, the area is adversely divided by some new buildings. These functional stripes make the optical barriers and they are clear in their axis. There are minimaly two six smaller areas created out of two bigger ones. Moving the main entrance from the courtyard to the rotunda center line means a possibility for the garden to step out towards its future development without some drastic changes in a objects which are part of a monument conservation but not functionally defined any more. The more, the garden gets its lost axiality, sense and a story about men's journey again. The application of the principles of the baroque garden in filling of the forefield gardens is either wrong or not considered properly. Polarized (and polar) gardens offer extreme positions of two contradictory trends. A superframed garden made by the nowadays technology versus a grove of wisdom where the nature is both a constructor and an architect. All of this with a baroque garden somewhere in its centre.
|
|
| |
|
|
WHAT TO DO? Conversion of industrial premises, Brno - Obřany
Hlavová, Michala ; Rudiš, Viktor (referee) ; Oplatek, Jiří (advisor)
What should I do? Reconversion INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX IN BRNO - Defense CENTRE FOR SCHOOLS OF ARCHITECTURE URBAN ISLAND identity, vymezenost, unique structure in place industrial park in the middle of smaller buildings housing crystallization point ARCHITECTURE: a historical legacy of industrial architecture of that period monolithic skeletons, ribbed ceilings, unique spaces Nature: River Svitavy and arm drive, split up and meet again western tip of the island - the natural growth of vegetation eastern corner of a meadow - a public residence lawn with many trees that support the visible axis of the weir from the bridge and a viaduct over the river The visual axis: the use and support (see A3 prints essay on the place, the situation visible axes) ABET visitors to the island schools and public holiday from cycling ... CONCEPT: Island of naturally defined as the area of ??the school of architecture, both publicly accessible area eastern tip of the island as a meeting place - students, residents Obrany, vacationers place to stay - Tourist lawn use of existing houses materials and visual axes to the creation of outdoor space adjustment of existing homes from the time of the recent sediments use of concrete monoliths of freedom space
|
|
| |
|
|
Revitalization Program of Floral Garden in Kromeriz
Doležel, Martin ; Sochor, Jan (referee) ; Ponešová, Barbora (advisor)
THE GARDEN IN A CRISIS The first problem. Moving the entrance from the rotunda axis in the north to the area where the farmyard surrounded by greenhouses is situated. The consequence of this step was destruction of the conception of a floral garden and further, confusion of a visitor caused by the new and excentric garden entrance. The second problem. The original noble fill of the forefield has been perfectly cleaned, including the structure. Therefore the courtyard of honour is wedged in the two huge unspecific areas. The third problem. The nineteenth century is gone. Nowadays visitor is hard to please and unconcentrated. THE CONCEPTION Revitalisation and amendment of the forefield structure concept in subareas is both practical and it offers the esthetic quality which was lost. In relation to the axis of the garden, the area is adversely divided by some new buildings. These functional stripes make the optical barriers and they are clear in their axis. There are minimaly two six smaller areas created out of two bigger ones. Moving the main entrance from the courtyard to the rotunda center line means a possibility for the garden to step out towards its future development without some drastic changes in a objects which are part of a monument conservation but not functionally defined any more. The more, the garden gets its lost axiality, sense and a story about men's journey again. The application of the principles of the baroque garden in filling of the forefield gardens is either wrong or not considered properly. Polarized (and polar) gardens offer extreme positions of two contradictory trends. A superframed garden made by the nowadays technology versus a grove of wisdom where the nature is both a constructor and an architect. All of this with a baroque garden somewhere in its centre.
|
|
| |
|
|
WHAT TO DO? Conversion of industrial premises, Brno - Obřany
Hlavová, Michala ; Rudiš, Viktor (referee) ; Oplatek, Jiří (advisor)
What should I do? Reconversion INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX IN BRNO - Defense CENTRE FOR SCHOOLS OF ARCHITECTURE URBAN ISLAND identity, vymezenost, unique structure in place industrial park in the middle of smaller buildings housing crystallization point ARCHITECTURE: a historical legacy of industrial architecture of that period monolithic skeletons, ribbed ceilings, unique spaces Nature: River Svitavy and arm drive, split up and meet again western tip of the island - the natural growth of vegetation eastern corner of a meadow - a public residence lawn with many trees that support the visible axis of the weir from the bridge and a viaduct over the river The visual axis: the use and support (see A3 prints essay on the place, the situation visible axes) ABET visitors to the island schools and public holiday from cycling ... CONCEPT: Island of naturally defined as the area of ??the school of architecture, both publicly accessible area eastern tip of the island as a meeting place - students, residents Obrany, vacationers place to stay - Tourist lawn use of existing houses materials and visual axes to the creation of outdoor space adjustment of existing homes from the time of the recent sediments use of concrete monoliths of freedom space
|
|
| |
|
| |
guest ::
