|
|
Later and Foreign Works of Josef Mach
Havlátová, Bára ; Wiendl, Jan (advisor) ; Merhaut, Luboš (referee)
The monographic thesis mainly solves poetry and prose of Josef Mach, the Czech writer, journalist and clerk. It watches literary progress of his poetics according to the era context, influenc of places, historical and social events and inspirations of other artists who surrounded him. The work look into the texts and lyrics by a diachronic and synchronic way. The section about his original works is followed by a chapter about translations of several novels, because he acted even on this literary field. Then the general outline of the reception of Mach's personality and works since the time of his life until today. The whole thesis is introduced by Mach's biography to which it returns in many topics because his works have an empiric character and it is closely connected to the life. The object of the thesis is to sum information about all these topics and give it as a base for future expert research.
|
|
|
Masaryk's reflections on history and historiography (Study regarding the so-called dispute over the meaning of Czech history)
HOLEC, Miloš
This work aims to use Masaryk's thoughts to analyse, summarise and interpret his philosophy of history. The introduction is followed by a chapter on the peculiarities of Masaryk's expressions. The third chapter looks at the perspective of eternity. This is Masaryk's yardstick for assessing history and its meaning. The term 'humanity' is also explained here. He bases his view on history and historiography on it, as right from the perspective of eternity. The chapter's conclusion analyses Josef Pekář's incorrect view on it and its opposite liberalism as understood by Masaryk. As demonstrated, Josef Kaizl and Kamil Krofta made a similar mistake, which had a practical impact in the escalation of the so-called conflict over the meaning of Czech history, or even directly in its origins. Masaryk's liberalism is subsequently given a separate chapter. This contains, amongst other things, practical examples of expressions of the opposite of humanity in history. The fifth chapter explains why it was humanity which Masaryk took as the basis of his philosophy of history. The sixth chapter explains how an ageing professor who had preached humanity his whole life could have led a war and even strived to ensure that a peace would not be concluded which would go against his political objectives. His relativisation of humanity wasn't sudden however, and didn't go against his pre-war values system, nor against his method of looking at history. As demonstrated, it was already in existence when Ceská otázka was written, which initiated the mentioned conflict.
|
|
|
Visions of how Central Europe should be organized in the thinking of T.G. Masaryk and M. Hodža: Study 5.315
Valenta, Petr
Složité národnostní a politické poměry střední Evropy inspirovaly politiky a intelektuály k promýšlení nejrůznějších vizí, které by tuto oblast pomohly stabilizovat. Práce se zabývá koncepcemi T. G. Masaryka a Milana Hodži, které prošly dynamickým vývojem. Do vypuknutí 1. světové války byla jejich představa uspořádání obdobná. Vycházeli z přesvědčení o vhodnosti zachování habsburské monarchie při její prohlubující se demokratizaci, která měla být i odpovědí na řešení národnostních sporů a emancipaci slovanských národů. V meziválečném období Masaryk spoléhal na versailleské uspořádání, které bylo otázkou celoevropskou, nikoli středoevropskou. Případnou federalizaci celé Evropy viděl Masaryk jako vzdálenější bod, do kterého mají národy Evropy dospět přirozeně z vlastní iniciativy. Hodžův akcent středoevropské spolupráce vycházel z realistického přesvědčení, že spoleh na versailleský systém není dostatečnou zárukou pro klid ve střední Evropě. Konkrétní spolupráci se snažil vést na hospodářském poli. Hodža své teze rozpracoval podrobně za 2. světové války v návrhu středoevropské federace. Spolupráce měla podle Hodži umožnit, aby se střední Evropa vymanila ze závislosti na turbulentním vývoji v Německu či Sovětském svazu.
Fulltext:  PDF
|
|
|
Between Masaryk´s and Kramář. Phenomenon Russia stand by generate of the Czechoslovakia
Vlček, Radomír
T.G.Masaryk and K. Kramář ranked among the most significant persons as regards formulating visions of of creating an independent Czechoslovak state. Russia, a large independent Slav-inhabited state, played by you an extremely important role. Kramář´s conception of Russia was based in idealization of the Russian milieu, while Masaryk´s critical Russophilism was based on judgement of Russia´s pros and cons.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
guest ::
