Název:
Rané romány idejí Aldouse Huxleyho: od Crome Yellow po Those Barren Leaves
Překlad názvu:
Aldous Huxley's early novels of ideas: from Crome Yellow to Those Barren Leaves
Autoři:
Renner, Luboš ; Procházka, Martin (vedoucí práce) ; Hilský, Martin (oponent) Typ dokumentu: Diplomové práce
Rok:
2007
Jazyk:
eng
Abstrakt: [eng][cze] The literary reputation of Aldous Huxley, the novelist, has scarcely ever been as good as that of Aldous Huxley, the essayist. In fact, as some critics claim, Huxley's novels have the crucial flaw of not being proper novels at all - they are (the critics say) 1 actually essays, some of them more skillfully dramatized than others. Whether the novels really suffer from their essayistic quality is a question to be answered by the reader; certain it is, though, that mixing the two genres, the novel and the essay, was Huxley's intention: As he once acknowledged in an interview, his aim as a novelist was ~to arrive, technically, at a perfect fusion of the novel and the essay"z. What are the main features of a Huxleyan essayistic novel? First , it is scarcity of plo t. In most Huxley' s novels nothing ever happens: people come and go, they meet and part, they (try to) make love, and - most importantly - they talk. This is, of course, true especially of Huxley's early conversation novels, a late novel like Ap e and E s s en c e probably being the most noticeable exception. Another aspect of the essayistic novel follows on the first. The scarce plot does not lead to any overall des i g n ; the novels end, as it were, in the middle of 'action'; there seems to be no single 'message' to be arrived at. Again, this...Diplomova prace si jako cil klade interpretaci prvnich tri romanu Aldouse Huxleyho - rom{mu C r 0 m eYe 1 low, Ant i c Hay a Those Barren Leaves jakozto tzv. romanu ideji, cili literarnich utvaru pohybujicich se na pomezi zanru romanu a filozofickeho eseje. Po uvodu, j enz zmifiuj e hlavni rysy huxleyovskeho romanu idej i a obhaj uj e volbu tri zminEmych del za predmet analyzy, nasleduje myslenkovy rozbor jednotlivych romanu, a to vzdy ve trech krocich: Nejprve jsou - jako podklad pro vlastni analyzu - strucne predstaveny hlavni postavy, prostredi a pribeh (jeli j aky) i nasleduj e pokus 0 vystizeni obecnych myslenkovych moti vu, charakteristickych pro ten ktery roman, tj. snaha 0 nalezeni urciteho radu ve zdanlive nesouvisejici mnozine myslenkovych projevu; nakonec se pozornost presouva na hlavni postavu (postavy) a jeji (jejich) "konflikt".