Original title: Problematika solipsismu a ontické reálnosti ne-Já u Fichteho
Translated title: The problem of solipsism and ontic reality of not-I in Fichte
Authors: Dubovec, Marcel ; Karásek, Jindřich (advisor) ; Sobotka, Milan (referee)
Document type: Bachelor's theses
Year: 2012
Language: slo
Abstract: [eng] [cze]
DUBOVEC, Marcel. The problem of solipsism and ontic reality of Not-I in Fichte (Bachelor's thesis). Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Arts, Institute for philosophy and religious studies. Supervisor: Dr. phil. habil. (PD) Jindřich Karásek, Dr. The Bachelor's thesis discuss Fichte's philosophy in connection with principles of the Science of Knowledge. These principles are often mistakenly unified with conception of solipsism. The task of the thesis is to deny this solipsistic understanding of Fichte's philosophy. This is achieved by closer examinig of three texts: Hölderlin's critique, first two principles of the Foundations of the Entire Science of Knowledge. With rejection of the solipsistic position the question of understanding of the absolute I is established. On the one hand there is a transcendental- logical interpretation of absolute I. On the other hand is through Heidegger's ontological difference proposed a hypothesis about understanding of absolute I as a being and Not-I as beings. The author is trying to see these two interpretations in unity. DUBOVEC, Marcel. Problematika solipsizmu a ontickej reálnosti Nie-Ja u Fichteho (Bakalárska práca). Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Filozofická fakulta, Ústav filosofie a religionistiky Vedúci práce: Dr. phil. habil. (PD) Jindřich Karásek, Dr. Bakalárska práca pojednáva o Fichteho filozofii v spojitosti so zásadami vedoslovia. Tie sú často mylne spájané s koncepciou solipsizmu. Úlohou práce je poprieť solipsistické chápanie Fichtovho idealizmu. Dosahuje sa toho skúmaním troch textov: Hölderlinovej kritiky, prvých dvoch zásad zo Základu celého vedoslovia a Druhého úvodu do vedoslovia. Popretím solipsistickej pozície sa nastoluje otázka chápania konceptu absolútneho Ja. Na jednej strane sa naskytá tradičná transcedentálne-logická interpretácia absolútneho Ja. Na druhej strane je prostredníctvom Heideggerovej ontologickej diferencie vyslovená hypotéza o chápaní absolútneho Ja ako bytia a Nie-Ja ako súcna. Autor sa pokúša nazerať tieto dve interpretácie v jednote.
Keywords: absolute I; being; ontological difference; solispism; absolútne Ja; bytie; ontologická diferencia; solipsizmus

Institution: Charles University Faculties (theses) (web)
Document availability information: Available in the Charles University Digital Repository.
Original record: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/42090

Permalink: http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-457735


The record appears in these collections:
Universities and colleges > Public universities > Charles University > Charles University Faculties (theses)
Academic theses (ETDs) > Bachelor's theses