National Repository of Grey Literature 2 records found  Search took 0.00 seconds. 
Karel Teige and the Liquidation of Aura
Vítů, Viktorie ; Rakušanová, Marie (advisor) ; Konečný, Lubomír (referee)
In my thesis I apply Walter Benjamin's thought as interpretative framework to Karel Teige's texts and I focus on notions of aura and autonomy. In the first chapter I initiate my exposition with reading Benjamin's notion of aura as spatiotemporal continuity of an artwork, its uniqueness if it is valued by society. I refuse that Benjamin rejects the autonomy of an artwork as opposite to its tendentiousness and political commitment. Benjamin's proclamation of the politicization of art from the conclusion of The Work of Art in the Age of its Technological Reproducibility is supposed to be read as the literarization of the conditions of living from his text Autor as Producer. In conclusion is admitted that this demand can be read as a rejection of autonomy of art as it is concieved in Peter Bürger's Theory of the Avant-Garde. In the second chapter I handle Teige's examination of phenomena which can be described by Benjamin's terminology as liquidation of aura. It is claim that Tegie as well as Benjamin rejects to award an original with a special status. Attention is payed to Teige's emphasis on democratization of artwork reception and to his practical artistic activity in nonauratistic media: to image poems and typography. In the third chapter is discussed what was Teige's attitude to autonomy of...
The Concept of Aura Between Benjamin and Adorno
Vítů, Viktorie ; Ritter, Martin (advisor) ; Matějčková, Tereza (referee)
In my thesis I focus on Benjamin's notion of aura which can be found in The Work of Art in the Age of its Technological Reproducibility and A short History of Photography. I read the notion of aura as uniqueness of (not only) work of art, its spatiotemporal continuity. In the second chapter Adorno's critique of Benjamin's position from The Work of Art in the Age of its Technological Reproducibility is introduced. Adorno states that Benjamin connects aura with autonomy and autonomy with contra-revolutionarity. Adrono's main project consists in the apology of autonomy of the artwork through showing its dialectic - artwork becomes social by its extirpation from society. In the last chapter I return to The Work of Art in the Age of its Technological Reproducibility and, with support in other works of Benjamin, show, why his proclamation of the politicization of art cannot be read as an appeal to the heteronomy of art and the condemnation of its autonomy. In the light of this is shown why Adorno's critique misses its target. My conclusion is, that if there is something what Benjamin sees as contra-revolutionary, it is not the autonomy, but the aura itself. However, it has to be taken with a grain of salt, because Benjamin does not refuse traditional media. He rather criticize the way how the society...

See also: similar author names
2 Vítů, Vendula
Interested in being notified about new results for this query?
Subscribe to the RSS feed.