|
Is theory of value an unjustly overlooked subject of economics?
Färber, Jan ; Pavlík, Ján (advisor) ; Potužák, Pavel (referee)
This thesis presents a positive answer to the question: "Is theory of value an unjustly overlooked subject of economics?" The positive answer is arrived at by analysis of logical and historical genesis of the concept of value itself and consequences of its nature to both concept of value and its applicability, as well as for economics proper and some of its subject matters (choice theory, theory of money and welfare theory).
|
|
Travel Behaviour Modelling Using Choice Experiment Method
Šilerová, Markéta ; Melichar, Jan (advisor) ; Kaprová, Kateřina (referee)
This diploma thesis is concerned with the use of the choice experiment method for modelling travel behaviour. The main scope of this diploma thesis is to find the main attributes for the individual's decision making about the student's choice of mean of transport. The models have been applied to long intercity trips between Prague and Brno. The model specification combines trip-based characteristics with socioeconomic characteristics. There are numerous European and US studies which have been conducted in a national context. In recent years, studies have been implemented also in the Czech Republic, but none of them focus on the specific segment of students. The principles of the choice experiment come out from the Lancaster' characteristics theory of value and random utility theory. The multinominal logit is used to the choice experiment analysis.
|
|
Alternative way of ICT investment evaluating
Tomek, Martin ; Říhová, Zora (advisor) ; Téra, Miroslav (referee)
This document introduces indicators' limitations and suitability which are nowadays used for evaluating ICT investments. For better understanding of indicators' application and their limits there was used a specific practical example. As a solution, the author suggests to use value management, specifically the universal theory of value for a customer. This theory was converted to be applicable for ICT and as such eliminates and minimizes problems and limitations of before listed indicator. To fulfill the theme, the author introduces benefits of ICT market and ICT investments from the macroeconomic point of view on behalf of Czech Republic.
|
|
Axiologic Aspects In Karel Englis's and Friedrich von Wieser's Writing
Melzochová, Jitka ; Vaverka, Tomáš (advisor) ; Hudík, Marek (referee)
Karel Englis's economic thought is derived from theories of Austrian school representatives; let us say its founders. Theory of value, a fundamental element of economic thought, he takes over and inserts to his original conception of polylogic based on three ways of thinking. The noetic ambiguity of terms in the theory that the oldest Austrian thinkers commit and is criticised by Englis is uncovered by rigorous implementation to the teleological order of thinking which presents the unique allowable way in economic science. Friedrich von Wieser, the founder of Austrian economic school besides Böhm-Bawerk sets up his own theory of value which is compared with Englis's doctrine in this thesis. The absence of honest formalization and psychological nature of the laws of human action in Wieser's piece is unacceptable for Englis as well as the execration of opportunity cost by Englis for Wieser. The author of this thesis tries to prove the illogicality of Englis's arguments for his negative attitude forwards opportunity cost.
|
|
KOMPARACE TEORIÍ KARLA ENGLIŠE S TEORIEMI RAKOUSKÉ ŠKOLY
Koderová, Jana ; Petráčková, Eva (advisor) ; Pavlíková, Ilona (referee)
Karel Engliš (1880-1961) patřil v období první republiky k významným ekonomům své doby.Pro odvozování ekonomických teorií vychází z Kantovské filosofie. Vedle kauzálního přístupu k vědě, který se používá při vědách přírodních, a přístupu normativního staví přístup teleologický, ze kterého logicky odvozuje ekonomické teorie. Engliš vychází z rakouské školy při odvození teorie hodnoty a relativní ceny. Na stranu druhou odmítá základní pilíře této školy, metodologický subjektivismus a částečně i individualismus. Liší se také rozdílným přístupem k nákladům, to je také důvodem, proč byl odpůrcem teorie nákladů obětované příležitosti rakouské školy.
|
| |