|
|
Campaign of the Czechoslovak National Socialist Party in the 1946 Elections
Šimek, David ; Shavit, Anna (advisor) ; Konrádová, Marcela (referee)
The bachelor thesis aims to present the campaign of the Czechoslovak National Socialist Party (CNSP) in the 1946 Elections, to which it also provides relevant theoretical and historical context. The post-war period in Czechoslovakia (1945-1948) is most often examined from the point of view of the Czechoslovak Communist Party and its gradual takeover of power in the state, culminating in February 1948. Other political parties of this period thus often find themselves overshadowed, despite their important role in the afterwar renewal of political and social life. This work therefore hopes to enrich the discourse with the CNSP perspective. The first part deals with theoretical background of political communication (examining the term propaganda) and with development of party organization and election campaigning. Emphasis is placed on concepts that approach the issues from a wider historical perspective, thus allowing an analysis of models and patterns of political practice which are in today's world mostly obsolete. The second part describes the political and social context of the 1946 Elections. The third part is dedicated to the Czechoslovak National Socialist Party, its origins, history and leading candidates in the 1946 elections. Subsequently, the main aspects of the party's election campaign...
|
|
|
"We were writing between the lines" (TV portrait - journalist Marta Bystrovová)
Mališová, Klára ; Šobr, Michal (advisor) ; Osvaldová, Barbora (referee)
This bachelor thesis consists of two parts - a practical and a theoretical one. The practical part is called We were writing between the lines and it is a documentary TV portrait of Marta Bystrovová, who was a journalist in Svobodné slovo for 25 years (between 1966-1991). The editorial office of this journal was situated at Wenceslas Square and because of that, Marta Bystrovová became a direct witness of the milestones in the history of Czechoslovakia (such as 1968 and 1989). Despite the press oppression, she did not hesitate to honestly inform about the events. Therefore the documentary is trying to show how it all influenced her opinions and beliefs. It is also demonstrating that there are ordinary people with extraordinary life story, whom nobody is saying ‚thanks' to, but they undoubtedly contributed to the evolvement of our society. The theoretical part adds facts to the practical one. First of all, it introduces Svobodné slovo, then, in comparison with Rudé právo, it focuses on what were the differences between these two journals and what was the role of Svobodné slovo, which was not, unlike from Rudé právo, under straight control of the leading Communist party, and therefore was trying to inform honestly about what was happening. The following chapter is about portraits in Svobodné slovo,...
|
guest ::
