|
|
Obstruction of justice
Dobrovičová, Michaela ; Vokoun, Rudolf (advisor) ; Bohuslav, Lukáš (referee)
Obstruction of justice Abstract In the introduction, this rigorosum thesis introduces to its readers the issue of the crime of obstruction of justice under the provisions of the Section 347a, Act No. 40/2009 Sb. Criminal Code, as amended, outlines the structure of the thesis and its main goals. Subsequently, the thesis is divided into nine chapters. In the first chapter I ponder about different perceptions of the term "justice". In the second chapter I analyze the theoretical context of evidence, which is fundamental for the further argumentation in the next chapters. Although the emphasis in the thesis is put on criminal proceedings, attention is also paid to civil proceedings. I analyze the types of legal evidence, where I deal more closely with with interrogation of the accused and witnesses, as well as documentary and material evidence. I also do not leave out the issue of onus and burden of proof. After all, an attempt to carry them may be the motive for the perpetrator to commit the crime of obstruction of justice. In the third chapter I describe the evolution of legal opinions on the criminal liability of lying and the presentation of falsified and altered evidence in time. On the base of the historical insight into this issue, I analyze the case law development over the last 15 years. I pay...
|
|
|
The burden of proof in the disputes for unjust enrichment
Dobrovičová, Michaela ; Pohl, Tomáš (advisor) ; Macková, Alena (referee)
1 The burden of proof in the disputes for unjust enrichment Abstract This diploma thesis deals with the institute of the burden of proof. Its aim is to analyse the distribution of the burden of proof in disputes for unjust enrichment. The thesis consists of an introduction, four main chapters, which are further internally divided and the conclusion. The introduction is focused mainly on the reasons of author's choice of the topic. The first chapter contains the general characteristics and interpretation of key concepts as well as related institutes, whose basic knowledge will be a key to other parts of the text. It explains the differences between the concepts of proof, counter-proof and objection. It then analyses the standard of proof needed to prove certain facts. It also describes the state of non liquet and analyses the individual procedural obligations and burdens of the parties. The subject of the second chapter of the thesis is the term of the burden of proof, which can be divided into the objective and subjective burden of proof. The subjective burden of proof can be further subdivided into the abstract and concrete burden of proof. The chapter goes on to analyse selected theories of distribution of the burden of proof, while not neglecting the negative theory of proof. In the partial conclusion,...
|
guest ::
