|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Organization of judiciaryand prosecution between 1918 and 1938
Procházka, Jakub ; Soukup, Ladislav (referee) ; Kindl, Vladimír (advisor)
Conclusion Reception and adoption of the Austria-Hungary legal order was agreed on by the politicians of the newly formed Czechoslovakia, which meant that the legal system of its state predecessor was used. The important reason for adopting this procedure and not forming a brand new legal order from the start was ensuring legal continuity, which was essential for the new state. The process could not take several years, but the system had to operate and come into force almost immediately. Only subsequently new legal regulations were to be formed and added to the adopted legal system and these regulations were supposed to reflect the situation in the state and society. After formation of the new state, it was necessary to immediately deal with the situations, which were created by adopting certain legal regulations, in which some institutions were mentioned, but these did not exist yet in the newly formed state. It concerned mainly the Supreme Court, which was established by the law 5/1918 Col. and Supreme Administrative Court established by the law 3/1918 Col. Adoption of the legal order was accompanied by adoption of the judiciary system, which smoothly followed the former organisation of the system of courts and continued with its work. The basic of the system remained District Courts, which were...
|
guest ::
RSS feed.