National Repository of Grey Literature 2 records found  Search took 0.01 seconds. 
Influencers and health: the case of presenting vitamins for better sleep
Varabyova, Lizaveta ; Numerato, Dino (advisor) ; Hrůzová, Andrea (referee)
This thesis deals with understanding how the value of sleep is presented, and the effectiveness of vitamins and dietary supplements for better sleep is constructed, specifically how influencers on social networks define sleep as a medical problem and its dependence on pharmaceutical products, which leads to and constructs these vitamins products promoting better sleep as commodities. Considering the research objectives, the method of content analysis was used. The resulting research sample consisted of 124 contributions. As it turns out, influencers systematically use a similar structure in their posts, which looks like this: 1) Problematization and definition of "bad" sleep; 2) (optional) Construction of the ideal of "good" sleep; 3) Offering potential solutions for a variety of sleep problems. In their posts, influencers also construct perceptions of the positive (natural ingredients, promotion of overall health and "feel- good", individualized solutions, affordable solutions) and negative aspects (risk of developing addiction or tolerance, masking sleep disorders, limited scientific evidence) of vitamins in addressing problems with sleep. They also use certain communication strategies in their content on various social media platforms, namely personal stories and narratives, educational content,...
Constructing the continuity of rational and moral dimensions of value in expert institutions
Hanzlík, Kryštof ; Čada, Karel (advisor) ; Numerato, Dino (referee)
In this theoretically focused thesis I make use of the example of vaccination against infectious diseases to show how expert institutions define value of its products through constructing a continuity of its rational and moral dimensions. This continuity allows rational and moral arguments to naturally complement themselves in a coherent discoursive and procedural frame which I call an institutional regime of the value of vaccination. Regarding general public, its crucial products are sanctions in the form of imputing decisional competence to those who vaccinate and decisional incompetence to those who do not. This competence is understood as both sign of optimal rationality and morally responsible behaviour which takes into account the common good. But besides external imputation, a decisional competence is also acquired through individual activity, which takes on a special importance for those who reject vaccination. They manage the imputations of incompetence through constituting alternative definitions of the value of health care in which they stress the importance of natural treatment and individual responsibility. These definitions of value manifest both on the level of narrowly focused rational discussion of expert recommendations and the level of more general ideas about legitimate ways to...

Interested in being notified about new results for this query?
Subscribe to the RSS feed.