National Repository of Grey Literature 3 records found  Search took 0.01 seconds. 
Inward FDI and Industrial Structure Optimization and Upgrading: Empirical Evidence from Central and East European EU Countries
Yao, Jinli ; Svoboda, Karel (advisor) ; Campos, Nauro Ferreira (referee) ; Semerák, Vilém (referee)
The main aim of this paper is to study whether the inward FDI will optimize and upgrade of industrial structure in Central and East European EU countries. If yes, which industry's inward FDI has a better effect on industrial structure optimization and upgrading? I established the influence mechanism as the analysis framework of the whole paper. Then I gathered a dataset of 11 CEE EU countries from 2000 to 2019 and established the industrial structure upgrading index and rationalization index. The empirical results showed that IFDI will optimize industrial structure in the short term and will upgrade industrial structure in the long term. IFDI from the secondary industry has the best effect on industrial structure optimization and upgrading. Therefore, this paper suggests that CEE EU countries introduce FDI, and emphasizes that they had better cooperate with foreign capital that helpful for the high-end development of the manufacturing industry in CEE EU countries. At the same time, they should promote the development of their own organization and management in order to absorb high technology and achieve technological catch-up.
Reform Redux: measurement, determinants and reversals
Campos, Nauro F. ; Horváth, Roman
In this paper writers put forward improved measures of economic liberalization across countries over time. They show that structural reforms, carefully measured, follow richer dynamics (than those from existing indexes) which are very closely linked to the theoretical work.
Fulltext: Download fulltextPDF
Does reform work?: an aconometric examination of the reform-growth puzzle
Babetskii, Ian ; Campos, Nauro F.
This paper, using data from 43 econometric studies, shows that one third of the coefficients (of reform on growth) are positive and significant, another third are negative and significant, and the final third are not statistically significant. In trying to understand this remarkable variation, writers find that the measurement of reform and controlling for institutions and initial conditions are the main factors in decreasing the probability of reporting a significant and positive effect of reform on growth.
Fulltext: Download fulltextPDF

Interested in being notified about new results for this query?
Subscribe to the RSS feed.