|
|
A comparison of orthodox and Arian depicting of christ in the late antigue iconography
Šprta, Marian ; Lášek, Jan Blahoslav (advisor) ; Hrdlička, Jaroslav (referee)
This work has a difficult task to try to summarise the difference between the orthodox and Arian iconographic concept of depicting Christ, mainly in late antiquity. The issue is taken from the point of systematic theology, ecclesial history and the history of art. The memory of Arianism, as the most widespread form of heresy, was a real threat for the church in the 3 rd century and therefore was almost fully eradicated. Arianism was met with the usual punishment of bad roman emperors - damnatio memoriae. It was be forgotten forever. So, all we know is taken from Arianism's opponents, orthodox Catholic historians and scholars. This concerns theological works as well as visual art works. When we study the theological background of this form of heresy, we see Jesus Christ as the first, the highest and the noblest creation of all, but as nothing more. God the Father, the only one, according to Arius, a presbyter from Alexandria, the founder of Arianism, is completely independent. He can not to have any Son. He cannot even be the Father. On principle God the Father is different from Jesus Christ the Son. The next progression in Arianism stated that the Son and the Father are alike. Arius's main opponent Athanasius, later orthodox bishop of Alexandria, insisted on the full godliness of Jesus Christ as the Son of...
|
|
|
The social accents of the pre - exilic Prophets (Historical and Theological Background)
Šprta, Marian ; Beneš, Jiří (advisor) ; Jaluška, Aleš (referee)
Resume: The work has a special theme of social accents of the prophets in the period before the exile. There is question what the chronology of the history of the royal era, in which the prophets spoke, was, what social processes were taking place at that time and how they are documented by biblical history and archeology. The first part of the work describes the historical situation in which these prophets were spreading their message. In this epoch the King's time was at the top of its peak, after which the crisis of transition from tribal society started into the urban civilization started which was finished by Israel's exile to Assyria and Judea in Babylon. In the northern empire peaks of the prosperity are considered to be the period during the reign of Achab and Jeroboam II. In the southern Empire it is the Uzziah's period. These peak times of prosperity, stemming from the state development, successful battles, and foreign trade, brought with an increase in social inequality and damage to social relations. The work depicts this time according to biblical sources, particulary the 1st and 2nd Books of Kings and the 2nd Paralipomenon. This section is followed by a chapter on interpretations by which Biblical archeology interprets archeological finds related to the time of the kingdom, especially from the...
|
|
|
A comparison of orthodox and Arian depicting of christ in the late antigue iconography
Šprta, Marian ; Lášek, Jan Blahoslav (advisor) ; Hrdlička, Jaroslav (referee)
This work has a difficult task to try to summarise the difference between the orthodox and Arian iconographic concept of depicting Christ, mainly in late antiquity. The issue is taken from the point of systematic theology, ecclesial history and the history of art. The memory of Arianism, as the most widespread form of heresy, was a real threat for the church in the 3 rd century and therefore was almost fully eradicated. Arianism was met with the usual punishment of bad roman emperors - damnatio memoriae. It was be forgotten forever. So, all we know is taken from Arianism's opponents, orthodox Catholic historians and scholars. This concerns theological works as well as visual art works. When we study the theological background of this form of heresy, we see Jesus Christ as the first, the highest and the noblest creation of all, but as nothing more. God the Father, the only one, according to Arius, a presbyter from Alexandria, the founder of Arianism, is completely independent. He can not to have any Son. He cannot even be the Father. On principle God the Father is different from Jesus Christ the Son. The next progression in Arianism stated that the Son and the Father are alike. Arius's main opponent Athanasius, later orthodox bishop of Alexandria, insisted on the full godliness of Jesus Christ as the Son of...
|
|
|
Adulthood by Hannah Arendt
Šprta, Marian ; Pinc, Zdeněk (advisor) ; Hogenová, Anna (referee) ; Lášek, Jan Blahoslav (referee)
The task of a work is to search and report on Hannah Arendt's conception of a maturity. This topic emerges in her work at describing her great issue, common crisis of modern world, which ended up in a totalitarian 20th century systems, how she declares at her papers Between past and future. This problem of philosophical anthropology and philosophy of education (Hannah Arendt didn't consider herselves as a philosopher or educationalist however) consecutively we must observe in broader context of her basic and the most systematic work The Human Condition, which can give us a Arendt's philosophical and political thinking concepts and terms. At rudimentary parts of the thesis we deal with her topic of break of tradition, which lead to mulling over basic pillar columns of tradition, commenced at ancient Rome, at first rate history, then religion, freedom, culture, authority, education. On the last one is visible her understanding of maturity. We are reporting problem of personality at her thinking likewise, which was influenced by phenomenology. Centrum of personality is "Who", unknowable to himself, disclosing sensually to other threw action and speaking so that in action in adulthood.
|
guest ::
