|
|
Main Principles and Elements of Roman Procedural Law
Škeříková, Jana ; Skřejpek, Michal (advisor) ; Blaho, Peter (referee) ; Židlická, Michaela (referee)
My doctoral thesis is focused on the main principles and elements of Roman procedural law. However, during my research I realised the terms are very similar. One of the main points of my thesis is dedicated to the constitutional system of Roman republic and its norms, including the very important law codex, the Twelve Tables Law. Moreover, I take the Justinian Codification of Roman law into focus. A very important source is also antique literature, texts of prominent lawyers and various types of administrative acts. A vast inspiration can be found in many European museums. The main principles and elements are applicable to actions, defendants and plaintiffs, to judicial hearing and to the days when judicial hearings could be held. I focus on principle of equity, good faith, and necessity of defense, res judicata, principle of appellation, pecuniary condemnation, and principle of assessment of evidence. The last chapter reviews other principles. It is also important to mention that different types of procedural cases are specific in their own way. I focused on describing the differences as well. My thesis analyzes seven most important principles. The first and the most important one is equity. My research shows that this principle is common to all areas of roman procedural law. I tried to explain...
|
|
|
Right to a fair trial in the constitutional court's decisions
Vančura, Jan ; Hofmannová, Helena (advisor) ; Řepa, Karel (referee)
- right to a fair trial in the constitutional court's decisions Right to a fair trial is rather an indispensable tool in the whole inventory of law mechanisms, due to the fact, it's being the only option we have, that enables the substantive law to come alive. Furthermore, it really designs the sole environment for the judiciary, thus being one of the essentials of the modern, democratic state, ruled by law. The thesis consists of five parts. Introduction opens with setting of the questions, the thesis is willing to give the answers to. History, being the important part of examined topic, is touched briefly, bringing upon the main points it's got to say to the contemporary fair trial. Law theory, necessary for the understanding of given topic, is also discussed within this section. Next chapter analyses the "outside warranties" of fair trial, meaning the authorities, responsible for taking the actions strictly under the rule of fair trial, namely the court and administration. Reasons are given, why the vast majority of appeals to the court, (mainly the Constitutional court of the Czech Republic) deal with particularities of fair trial being breached, what is their typical fate and why does such occur. The main part gives the "intrinsic warranties", being usually known under the maxims of the fair...
|
|
|
Judicial and Police Cooperation in the European Union
Coufalová, Tereza ; Jelínek, Jiří (advisor) ; Tlapák Navrátilová, Jana (referee) ; Sváček, Jan (referee)
The criminal justice as well as the persons participating in criminal proceedings, they both are currently facing number of newly posed challenges and unanswered questions so far, due to the onward going integration of the European Union and much closer cooperation of the Member States, in the field of the Procedural Criminal Law. There have been established many new institutions within the field of the European Union in last few years and there were adopted many legal tools which directly influence the cooperation between the judicial and police authorities of individual countries. In connection with newly emerging forms of the crime and more coherent cooperation of the perpetrators of severe crime, the relevant authorities at the union level as well as at the national level encounter situations not being resolved at all, or which are specified by theoretical standards only and have not been put into practice yet. Due to the diversity and abundance of the legal tools and institutions which interfere the criminal law sphere without adjusting their mutual cooperation or without having sorted out the priority of application in many cases, the author of this thesis considers as an appropriate to have such comprehensive view to this relevant issue introduced to the specialized public, as well as having...
|
|
|
Main Principles and Elements of Roman Procedural Law
Škeříková, Jana ; Skřejpek, Michal (advisor) ; Blaho, Peter (referee) ; Židlická, Michaela (referee)
My doctoral thesis is focused on the main principles and elements of Roman procedural law. However, during my research I realised the terms are very similar. One of the main points of my thesis is dedicated to the constitutional system of Roman republic and its norms, including the very important law codex, the Twelve Tables Law. Moreover, I take the Justinian Codification of Roman law into focus. A very important source is also antique literature, texts of prominent lawyers and various types of administrative acts. A vast inspiration can be found in many European museums. The main principles and elements are applicable to actions, defendants and plaintiffs, to judicial hearing and to the days when judicial hearings could be held. I focus on principle of equity, good faith, and necessity of defense, res judicata, principle of appellation, pecuniary condemnation, and principle of assessment of evidence. The last chapter reviews other principles. It is also important to mention that different types of procedural cases are specific in their own way. I focused on describing the differences as well. My thesis analyzes seven most important principles. The first and the most important one is equity. My research shows that this principle is common to all areas of roman procedural law. I tried to explain...
|
|
|
Processus iudiciarius secundum stilum Pragensem by Nicolaus Puchnik, critical edition of the treatise
Budský, Dominik ; Hledíková, Zdenka (advisor) ; Hrdina, Antonín (referee) ; Kejř, Jiří (referee)
Abstrakt_anglicky The PhD thesis is focused on canon procedural law in Prague at the end of 14th century. The purpose is to prepare a critical edition and summary of the treatise Processus iudiciarius secundum stilum Pragensem and to contextualize it to iuridical and administrative connections in the period at the end of the 14th and beginning of the 15th centuries. The researched treatise was a very useful theoretical and practical vademecum of procedural law and was used not only by students of law at The University of Prague as a manual but also by archiepiscopal clerks, as well as plaintiffs and defendants in the single cases. The thesis consists of the biography of the author Nicolaus Puchnik, canon law analysis and commentary incl., local customs, manuscript analysis based on paleography and codicology, European context analysis based on the juristic style and, last but not least, the edition. The edition is composed of four manuscripts (Munich 677 as the basic text version and other three manuscripts originated in the 14th century).
|
guest ::
