|
|
Budgeting works for the purposees of expert reports
Nykodýmová, Veronika ; Comorek, Martin (referee) ; Hromádka, Vít (referee) ; Marková, Leonora (advisor)
In the more expert practice, we need an expert report, the main part of the budget works.The budget for the construction of the most by the degrese of project documentation. For the purposes of the budget for expert in most cases does not have the komplete project documentation, is contained in the file on the basis of oral communication to stakeholders and on the basic of which it requires, or which shall ensure in the measurement. The more quality work is available, the more accurate the output in the form of a budget.There is currently no single procedur efor the construction of production in an expert opinion. For theis mason, i tis the main aim of this thesis in a flowchart, the overview of the possibilities of obtaining the neceséry supporting documents to the budget and the tool works and how Theky should proceed in that report. Use the flowchart in expert practice shall be verified at model examples in the conclusion of this dissertation.
|
|
|
Expert Evidence
Coufalová, Jana ; Jelínek, Jiří (advisor) ; Vanduchová, Marie (referee)
The thesis called "Expert proofs" deals with one of the types of proper evidence which is applied in cases when an expert report is necessary to clarify facts important for criminal trial proceedings. Thesis is divided into 5 basic chapters. The first chapter is introductory and talks about some of the general problems of expert laws - evaluation of the current legal regulations of expert's function - expert law and expert ordinance, especially from the point of view of the changes that these legal regulations have undergone as well as the forthcoming changes in the form of updating of the current law and preparation of a brand new law. It also talks about definition of an expert, especially the difference between a witness and a consultant, then briefly about their rights and duties in the criminal trial proceedings in general. The second chapter deals with the presence of an expert explicitly in criminal trial proceedings and is divided into three parts. The first one provides basic information about admitting an expert and its form. The second one concerns the definition of an expert's assignment and the third one concerns preparation of an expert report, in which the expert familiarizes themselves with the criminal case. The third chapter deals with the actual output of an expert's investigation, its...
|
|
|
Expert evidence in criminal proceedings
Borčevský, Pavel ; Musil, Jan (advisor) ; Gřivna, Tomáš (referee) ; Sváček, Jan (referee)
This thesis addresses the use of expert evidence in criminal trial proceedings. The author's primary aim is to present a thorough analysis of this highly specific form of evidence as contained in the Criminal Procedure Code, Act No. 141/1961 Coll., to identify its insufficiencies, and to suggest some potential legislative modifications. The author is aware that the role of an expert in criminal proceedings is also determined in part by the Act on Experts and Interpreters, Act No. 36/1967 Coll., but he deals with this organizational norm only marginally, as his main goal is to analyze the possibilities of using expert evaluations within the framework of criminal procedure. In this thesis, the author describes the historical development of this type of evidence, discusses the concept of the role of the expert in legal theory, and above all, presents his views regarding the law currently in effect, describing the use of expert evidence from its initial stages of appointment of an expert to the preparation and presentation of the expert opinion and the evaluation thereof. The author also takes account of some currently topical issues such as the confrontation of experts and the use of computer software in the expert's work. Given that recodification of the Criminal Procedure Code is currently underway,...
|
|
|
Expert evidence in criminal proceedings
Borčevský, Pavel ; Musil, Jan (advisor) ; Gřivna, Tomáš (referee) ; Sváček, Jan (referee)
This thesis addresses the use of expert evidence in criminal trial proceedings. The author's primary aim is to present a thorough analysis of this highly specific form of evidence as contained in the Criminal Procedure Code, Act No. 141/1961 Coll., to identify its insufficiencies, and to suggest some potential legislative modifications. The author is aware that the role of an expert in criminal proceedings is also determined in part by the Act on Experts and Interpreters, Act No. 36/1967 Coll., but he deals with this organizational norm only marginally, as his main goal is to analyze the possibilities of using expert evaluations within the framework of criminal procedure. In this thesis, the author describes the historical development of this type of evidence, discusses the concept of the role of the expert in legal theory, and above all, presents his views regarding the law currently in effect, describing the use of expert evidence from its initial stages of appointment of an expert to the preparation and presentation of the expert opinion and the evaluation thereof. The author also takes account of some currently topical issues such as the confrontation of experts and the use of computer software in the expert's work. Given that recodification of the Criminal Procedure Code is currently underway,...
|
|
|
Budgeting works for the purposees of expert reports
Nykodýmová, Veronika ; Comorek, Martin (referee) ; Hromádka, Vít (referee) ; Marková, Leonora (advisor)
In the more expert practice, we need an expert report, the main part of the budget works.The budget for the construction of the most by the degrese of project documentation. For the purposes of the budget for expert in most cases does not have the komplete project documentation, is contained in the file on the basis of oral communication to stakeholders and on the basic of which it requires, or which shall ensure in the measurement. The more quality work is available, the more accurate the output in the form of a budget.There is currently no single procedur efor the construction of production in an expert opinion. For theis mason, i tis the main aim of this thesis in a flowchart, the overview of the possibilities of obtaining the neceséry supporting documents to the budget and the tool works and how Theky should proceed in that report. Use the flowchart in expert practice shall be verified at model examples in the conclusion of this dissertation.
|
|
|
Expert Evidence
Coufalová, Jana ; Jelínek, Jiří (advisor) ; Vanduchová, Marie (referee)
The thesis called "Expert proofs" deals with one of the types of proper evidence which is applied in cases when an expert report is necessary to clarify facts important for criminal trial proceedings. Thesis is divided into 5 basic chapters. The first chapter is introductory and talks about some of the general problems of expert laws - evaluation of the current legal regulations of expert's function - expert law and expert ordinance, especially from the point of view of the changes that these legal regulations have undergone as well as the forthcoming changes in the form of updating of the current law and preparation of a brand new law. It also talks about definition of an expert, especially the difference between a witness and a consultant, then briefly about their rights and duties in the criminal trial proceedings in general. The second chapter deals with the presence of an expert explicitly in criminal trial proceedings and is divided into three parts. The first one provides basic information about admitting an expert and its form. The second one concerns the definition of an expert's assignment and the third one concerns preparation of an expert report, in which the expert familiarizes themselves with the criminal case. The third chapter deals with the actual output of an expert's investigation, its...
|
|
|
Issue of defining construction defects and failures
Šmahel, Milan
Submission of expert reports in litigation concerning the application of discount on previously purchased old real property due to subsequently discovered construction defects and failures led the author to write this contribution. An expert can be given various tasks in the area of this issue, for example, of specifying and determining: whether by the takeover date of real property by a buyer subject properties embodied defects and failures which the buyer had pointed out to a seller. Then, what costs the buyer must spend on removing subject defects and failures, whether defects and failures are caused by a common wear and tear of an object or by something else, and whether and which of the defects and failures originated from an old and worn object. Moreover, whether such wear and tear, with regard to a life span of individual construction components, was common or not and whether (by the takeover date) the objects were suitable for the use and purpose which they were intended (e.g. housing) for. Last but not least, whether it is possible to specify apparent defects and latent defects by discovered defects and failures, to determine price for real property by the sale date, including both determined price according to the price regulation and common price. Simultaneously, the expert can be given the task to express his view on expert reports attached to a file. Both a great number of tasks and a great number of discovered defects and failures mean a big amount of demanding work for experts. It is appropriate to deal with such work systematically right from the beginning so that conducted analyses, final defining of individual pointed defects and failures and final answers are factual, clear and in order. The author’s experience with the issue of dealing with reports in this area is the subject of this contribution.
|
|
|
Methodology for evaluating the cause of an accident at specific traffic accidents
Kohút, Pavol
For traffic accidents when one vehicle enter into the opposite direction lane, the criterion for the cause of an accident (for most cases) is the collision place. In most car accidents when a vehicle enters the opposite lane, this happen suddenly, sometimes sliding sideways, and in such cases it is (the collision place) a very good indicator for the causes of traffic accidents. Rarely, however, there are also accidents, where there is not decisive in which lane impact happened. Such traffic accidents, however, occur very rarely and by the experts are often considered for the assessment of the causes of traffic accidents wrong. The present article focuses on the methodology of evaluation of the causes of an accident just when such specific cases.
|
guest ::
