|
|
Application of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules in practice.
Hejný, Tomáš ; Růžička, Květoslav (advisor) ; Brodec, Jan (referee)
- Application of the UNCITRALArbitration Rules in practice This master thesis deals with the new trends in arbitration and their applicability by the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules as the most important ad hoc arbitration rules worldwide. The purpose of the master thesis is to clarify how UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules are applied in practice related to the new trends and compared to "rival" institutionalized arbitration rules. The aim of the master thesis is to determine which of these trends can be incorporated in the form of new provisions into the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules and to what extent such an amendment would be beneficial to the "user" of these rules. It is worth noting that the aim of the thesis is not to provide an exhaustive enumeration of all current trends in the arbitration. The thesis is divided into three parts; each part is made up of several chapters. The first part analyzes the basic elements of the arbitration, the differences between institutionalized and ad hoc arbitration as well as the basic elements of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. The second part deals with the new trends in arbitration: expedited procedure, summary procedure (summary dismissal) and consolidation of arbitrations. In the introduction, there is a list of all above-mentioned trends in the arbitration. In later...
|
|
|
Expedited and urgent procedure in proceedings before the Court of Justice of the European Union
Kutlík, Michal ; Král, Richard (referee) ; Pítrová, Lenka (referee)
The presented thesis deals with an analysis of the accelerated and urgent procedure in proceedings before the Court of Justice of the European Union. The thesis concretely analyses the expedited procedure in proceedings regarding actions before the General Court and proceedings regarding actions and appeals before the Court of Justice, as well as expedited and urgent preliminary procedure. Each chapter deals with the analysis of the specific procedures in view of the description of the historical context for introduction of the procedure, characteristics of the procedure, statistics for granting the specific procedure, the most interesting cases from the Court's case-law and a final short summary of the specific procedure. Mutual comparison of the procedures is also described in the thesis, allowing to better understand the differences between the two methods, not only from the perspective of the instance, which deals with the case, but also in light of their different scope within the preliminary ruling. The aim of this thesis is to define the place of the expedited and urgent procedure in proceedings before the Court of Justice of the European Union in the light of the new version of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice and outline their possible application in the future.
|
guest ::
