|
|
Garden city
Štefková, Dominika ; Pohůnek, Jakub (referee) ; Toman, Radek (advisor)
Both blocks are architecturally almost identical. Their only difference is in the mirroring and the change of functions in the ground floor. The mass of the block has a square floor plan, which maintains a flat urban mass from the outside. The retreating terraces are oriented inside the block, thus creating a conical atrium. This atrium does not follow a square shape but is widened on the north-south sides. Around the perimeter of the block there are flats which, together with the supporting structure, form a facade from the outside. The inner perimeter of the block consists of shared terraces. These terraces form the communication of the whole building. All stairs are connected to it. The terraces give way to each floor by 1.5 m and with them the staircase arms are located on the east and west sides of the atrium. To the north and south are two stairwells with an elevator. The floor plan arrangement is centrally axially symmetrical.
|
|
|
Prison Story
Štefková, Dominika ; Petermann, Tomáš (referee) ; Kristek, Jan (advisor)
The thesis is a continuation of a pre-diploma project on the stigmatization of buildings and society's perception of buildings that do not have the most pleasant past behind them. The project deals with the question of the new use of the decaying prison in Uherské Hradiště. Through a meaningful program, it seeks to bring the building back to life and incorporate the current 19th century time bubble back into the urban fabric, while not obscuring the grim past of the site. The thesis is a continuation of a pre-diploma project on the stigmatization of buildings and society's perception of buildings that do not have the most pleasant past behind them. It deals with the question of the new use of the decaying building of the former prison in Uherské Hradiště. The project seeks a meaningful program and architectural solution that would bring the building back to life and integrate it back into the urban fabric. The Slovácké Theatre, which operates in Uherské Hradiště, is moving into the building. The Slovácké Theatre is located in the leased space of the former Sokolovna. The big disadvantage of the existing theatre is the small space for its facilities. Workshops and warehouses are not located here at all. In addition, the existing theatre building is located just off a busy road and thus has no space for people to linger after the theatre. On a symbolic level, the theatre is a program that allows the city to deal with the problematic past of the prison building in a lively way. The proposal does not preserve the prison building, it does not "musealize" it. It is not afraid of radical interventions and demolition, which allows not only to harmonize the operation of the theatre with the historical building, but also to make the closed building completely accessible and transparent. Consciously and through architectural design, the object, excluded from society, becomes its own opposite: a social centre accessible to all. A social conscience and a mirror, not a prison, but a theatre. At the same time, the redevelopment does not try to erase the prison past. The remaining fragments of the buildings are left in their rawness, with a clearly legible trace of solitary confinement and a façade in the style of "architecture terrible".
|
|
|
Prison Story
Štefková, Dominika ; Petermann, Tomáš (referee) ; Kristek, Jan (advisor)
The thesis is a continuation of a pre-diploma project on the stigmatization of buildings and society's perception of buildings that do not have the most pleasant past behind them. The project deals with the question of the new use of the decaying prison in Uherské Hradiště. Through a meaningful program, it seeks to bring the building back to life and incorporate the current 19th century time bubble back into the urban fabric, while not obscuring the grim past of the site. The thesis is a continuation of a pre-diploma project on the stigmatization of buildings and society's perception of buildings that do not have the most pleasant past behind them. It deals with the question of the new use of the decaying building of the former prison in Uherské Hradiště. The project seeks a meaningful program and architectural solution that would bring the building back to life and integrate it back into the urban fabric. The Slovácké Theatre, which operates in Uherské Hradiště, is moving into the building. The Slovácké Theatre is located in the leased space of the former Sokolovna. The big disadvantage of the existing theatre is the small space for its facilities. Workshops and warehouses are not located here at all. In addition, the existing theatre building is located just off a busy road and thus has no space for people to linger after the theatre. On a symbolic level, the theatre is a program that allows the city to deal with the problematic past of the prison building in a lively way. The proposal does not preserve the prison building, it does not "musealize" it. It is not afraid of radical interventions and demolition, which allows not only to harmonize the operation of the theatre with the historical building, but also to make the closed building completely accessible and transparent. Consciously and through architectural design, the object, excluded from society, becomes its own opposite: a social centre accessible to all. A social conscience and a mirror, not a prison, but a theatre. At the same time, the redevelopment does not try to erase the prison past. The remaining fragments of the buildings are left in their rawness, with a clearly legible trace of solitary confinement and a façade in the style of "architecture terrible".
|
|
|
Garden city
Štefková, Dominika ; Pohůnek, Jakub (referee) ; Toman, Radek (advisor)
Both blocks are architecturally almost identical. Their only difference is in the mirroring and the change of functions in the ground floor. The mass of the block has a square floor plan, which maintains a flat urban mass from the outside. The retreating terraces are oriented inside the block, thus creating a conical atrium. This atrium does not follow a square shape but is widened on the north-south sides. Around the perimeter of the block there are flats which, together with the supporting structure, form a facade from the outside. The inner perimeter of the block consists of shared terraces. These terraces form the communication of the whole building. All stairs are connected to it. The terraces give way to each floor by 1.5 m and with them the staircase arms are located on the east and west sides of the atrium. To the north and south are two stairwells with an elevator. The floor plan arrangement is centrally axially symmetrical.
|
guest ::
RSS feed.