|
Methods for the solution of nonlinear equations
Havelková, Eva ; Kučera, Václav (advisor) ; Tichý, Petr (referee)
The aim of this bachelor thesis is to present an overview of elementary numerical methods for solving nonlinear algebraic equations in one variable. Firstly, related concepts from numerical mathematics and mathematical analysis are explained. The main part of the thesis provides a detailed description of chosen iterative methods as well as the proofs of their orders of convergence. The methods covered are namely the bisection method, fixed-point iteration, regula falsi method, Newton's method, secant method and methods that are based on quadratic interpolation. The practical part of the thesis presents results of numerical experiments that were carried out with Matlab software on various types of nonlinear equations. These results are compared with the theory introduced in the preceding parts. The contribution of this thesis is to provide a comprehensive overview and comparison of the characteristics of basic methods for solving nonlinear equations based on a variety of literature. Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
|
| |
|
Polynomial Equations Roots
Tomšík, Filip ; Kopřiva, Jan (referee) ; Kunovský, Jiří (advisor)
Bachelor´s thesis purpose was been study solution algebraic and differential equation. We were studying Bairstow method, which is the most conducive to solution homogenous differential equation higher order. Implementation Bairstow method and her connection with Gauss elimination method. In the end we are performed tests on rate calculation and accuracy.
|
|
Algebraic Equations Comparisons
Nečasová, Gabriela ; Kunovský, Jiří (referee) ; Šátek, Václav (advisor)
The thesis deals with the topic of comparative calculation of algebraic equations. First it describes the comparison of the overall number of operations at direct and iteration met\-hods, as well as gives concrete examples of the methods and explains solutions of direct and iteration methods. Another part focuses on possible methods of converting systems of linear algebraic equations to the system of differential equations. The end of the thesis describes method of working with TKSL/C, Matlab and Maple. In this thesis, there was designed graphical user interface serving for comfortable communication with TKSL/C programme. Graphical user interface was tested on concrete tasks demonstrating the conversion of system of linear algebraic equations to the system of differential equations.
|
|
Algebraic Equations Solution Convergence
Sehnalová, Pavla ; Šátek, Václav (referee) ; Kunovský, Jiří (advisor)
The work describes techniques for solving systems of linear and differential equations. It explains the definition of conversion from system of linear to system of differential equations. The method of the elementary transmission and the transform algorithm are presented. Both of methods are demonstrated on simply examples and properties of conversion are shown. The work compares fast and accurate solutions of methods and algorithm. For computing examples and solving experiments following programs were used: TKSL and TKSL/C. The program TKSL/C was enriched with the graphic user interface which makes the conversion of systems and computing results easier.
|
|
Comparison of various methods for nonlinear analysis of structures from the point of view of speed, accuracy and robustness.
Bravenec, Ladislav ; Křiváková, Jarmila (referee) ; Němec, Ivan (advisor)
The aim of the thesis is to compare the iterative methods which program RFEM 5 uses the non-linear calculations of structures, namely the analysis of large deformations and post critical analysis. Comparison should serve as a basis for which calculation method is the most accurate, fastest and most reliable in terms of getting results. Time-consuming will be judged according to the calculation of the solution and the time needed to compute one iterativ. Robustness we will compare the reliability of methods in in normal use. Accuracy of the calculation will be determined by comparing the maximum deformation structures. Comparison will be made with examples from practice.
|
| |