|
|
The dehumanization of thinking
Kršňák, Jan ; Hanáková, Petra (referee) ; Petříček, Miroslav (advisor)
This is not a summary, but a meaningless part of my thesis. Even it is not a part of it at all. There is no summary in czech. There is no method, but a lot of ruptures, errors, guessworks, and above all gaps. This text is a singular discourse, closed into itself like a black hole and a conceptual film, which has to be seen by reading and read by looking. There is no particular message, this storytelling has no start and no end and doesn't care about present anything to a reader. It is a text which has to be used, because you can't find out any meanings here, if you don't participate in creating them. It is a pulse burst, acummulation of small stories. I use biology, physics, geology, bacteriology and other siences that I don't understand, what helps me to use their stories by the way I need to tell my story which consists only of gaps. There is no diference between physical laws and rules of football. Nature has no grammar and some particles deny to be right, others are missing. Human brain is a result of an easy level of computer game. I don't read Aristotle because of he hadn't a TV set at home. Racionality was dissolved by storytelling and imagination. I use works of Deleuze, Guattari, Baudrillard, Virilio, Debord, De Landa and advertising industry. A rock is considered to be a movie here. A landscape is...
|
guest ::
RSS feed.