|
|
Milena Linhartová
Bahenská, Marie
The inventory of Milena Linhartová’s personal papers holds above all working notes to the Czech history in the 14th century, copies of medieval documents and papers, and separates of special articles from the 2nd half of the 20th century.
|
|
|
Series of Lectures by the Philosophical Association on Nationality Dated 1918. Significance, Concept, Course
Hermann, Tomáš
Theme of the article is an analysis of a series of lectures on the essence of a nation, which waa organized in 1918 by the Philosophical Union, the Czech association for the development of philosophy. The first part evaluated the public activity of the Philosophical Union during the war. The second part describes the circumstance and course of the cycle Lectures on the Essence of Nationality, in which leading Czech experts from various fields and orientation of thought lectured, should have lectured and led discussions. The end of the war and new nationality emphasized the meaning of the issues discussed: on the other hand, they led to the gradual cessation of the series, the former purpose of which had been lost. The third part provides a specific historical reconstruction of the course of the series. The fourth part analyses the period discussion of the experts represented and their conception of the theory of a nation.
|
|
|
Originality of Science and the Issue of Plagiarism. Three Contribution by E. Rádl from the years 1902-1911 on Language Issues in Science
Hermann, Tomáš
Subject of the contribution includes selected publicistical and polemical outputs of biologist and philosopher Emanuel Rádl (1873-1942) from two decades before the First World War, which touch upon the issues of national language in science: 1. In a small replica from 1902, R. Fick, a professor from Leipzig, was interested in the general issue of the meaning of science being accomplished in the national languages of small nations. 2. In a longer, idependent essay from 1910 on the nature of Czech natural sciences, Rádl reacted to the general accusation that Czech science lacked originality and plagiarized the German model. 3. At the same time, Rádl himself headed directly into the heart of the Czech scientific community, accusing his colleague, botanist K. Domin, of plagiarism. The following furious controversy affected a part of the natural sciences community. The biographical circumstances related to one individual show one type deliberation of the time on the language issue in science.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
guest ::
