National Repository of Grey Literature 1 records found  Search took 0.01 seconds. 
Taking of Evidence
Suchá Balogh, Zuzana ; Winterová, Alena (advisor) ; Frintová, Dita (referee) ; Kolesár, Pavel (referee)
TAKING OF EVIDENCE ABSTRACT This dissertation deals with the process of taking of evidence in the civil proceeding, while focusing primarily on the contradictory procedure. The differences between the contradictory and non-contradictory procedure are also being highlighted. The taking of evidence is considered a fundamental part of the civil proceeding, upon whose course and outcomes the judicial decision is being based. In the contradictory procedure, the activity of the party to the proceeding plays a pivotal role in the taking of evidence, which follows primarily from the underlying adversarial principle. However, the importance of the activity of the party to the proceeding in the taking of evidence shall not be entirely dismissed in the non-contradictory procedure either. Nonetheless, the non-contradictory procedure is governed by the investigation principle, with the sole responsibility for the taking of evidence vested in the court. Taking these fundamental differences into account, I analyze the specifics of the contradictory and non-contradictory procedure, which manifest themselves within the sphere of procedural rights and obligations of the parties to the civil proceeding as well as in the distinct powers of the court in the process of taking of evidence. When writing my dissertation, I have...

Interested in being notified about new results for this query?
Subscribe to the RSS feed.