|
|
Artificial Intelligence as a Challenge for the Justification of Human Rights
Florian, Oldřich Tristan ; Koloušek, Martin (referee)
Artificiál Intělligěncě ás á Chállěngě for thě Justificátion of Humán Rights Abstráct Thěrě is á long-stánding děbátě ábout thě morál státus of ánimáls, humáns in á věgětátivě státě, or ěmbrýos, ánd bý ěxtěnsion ábout thěir possiblě rights. In thě ěrá of thě risě of ártificiál intělligěncě, thěsě quěstions ěxtěnd to robots. This těxt áttěmpts to rělátě thěsě děbátěs to thě fiěld of humán rights thěoriěs. Humán rights thěoriěs árě ábout justifýing humán rights in morál sěnsě, ánd this dissěrtátion ěxáminěs whěthěr ádváncěs in ártificiál intělligěncě máý problěmátisě várious such justificátion thěoriěs. Kěýwords lěgál philosophý, humán rights, ártificiál intělligěncě, robots, humán rights thěoriěs, rights, robot rights
|
|
|
Protection of personality in scope of legal philosophy and applicable law
Němec, Ronald ; Gerloch, Aleš (advisor) ; Harvánek, Jaromír (referee) ; Beran, Karel (referee)
PROTECTION OF PERSONALITY IN SCOPE OF LEGAL PHILOSOPHY AND APPLICABLE LAW 1. Summary We can see law from two main perspectives. Law is either complex of written regulations, which are prepared by human beings based on some interests or it is a complex of rules, which altough are written, but its nature are originating from higher normative system. First is a present perspective. Current law science is prefering valid law as complex of regulations published in statute book. What is not banned by law, is allowed. Though this law philosophy is leading to instability in society. Every year legislator is making hundreds of amendements and create new laws to cover new circumstances which appear in the society. Despite legislator effort is society further unsatisfied with legal state. Society claims that law is enforceable for those who are able to hire big law firms, which can find neccesary grey areas. Immanuel Kant among the first draw a problem between legality and legitimacy. But it is not only matter of legislator whether he acts legitimately or legally, but as well as of receiver of law norm. Is every legal act of the recepient of the legal order of the Czech Republic legal as legitimate? Legal yes, if in conformity with legal order. But is it even legitimate? And is it moral? For juspositivism is...
|
guest ::
