|
|
Comparison of Parallel File Systems
Pazdera, Michal ; Michal, Bohumil (referee) ; Kašpárek, Tomáš (advisor)
The goal of this thesis was to explore several parallel file systems, and to evaluate their performance under various conditions. The main focus of this assessment were read and write speeds in different workloads, the reliability of each system, and also their ability to protect from data loss. Initially, this thesis introduces eight of the most commonly used parallel file systems. From these, three were selected for further testing: Lustre, GlusterFS, and CephFS. To be able to evaluate their performance accurately, a suite of automated tests was developed. These benchmarks were run for each individual file system in our testing lab. The final part of this work evaluates the results and discusses the features of each of the file systems and their suitability for particular workloads.
|
|
|
Comparison of Parallel File Systems
Pazdera, Michal ; Michal, Bohumil (referee) ; Kašpárek, Tomáš (advisor)
The goal of this thesis was to explore several parallel file systems, and to evaluate their performance under various conditions. The main focus of this assessment were read and write speeds in different workloads, the reliability of each system, and also their ability to protect from data loss. Initially, this thesis introduces eight of the most commonly used parallel file systems. From these, three were selected for further testing: Lustre, GlusterFS, and CephFS. To be able to evaluate their performance accurately, a suite of automated tests was developed. These benchmarks were run for each individual file system in our testing lab. The final part of this work evaluates the results and discusses the features of each of the file systems and their suitability for particular workloads.
|
guest ::
