National Repository of Grey Literature 3 records found  Search took 0.00 seconds. 
Filosoficko-metodologické problémy ekonomie: projekt ekonomické fenomenologie
Svoboda, Miroslav ; Schwarz, Jiří (advisor) ; Loužek, Marek (referee) ; Klamer, Arjo (referee)
In recent years, the economic approach to human behavior has been challenged by contributions of cognitive science. Thus two methodological strands in economics disagree with each other: the objectivistic approach favors the methods of natural science; the subjectivistic approach takes the teleological structure of human action as its cornerstone. It is argued that the position of the latter has been undermined and often degraded to a mere instrumentalist tool because it builds upon the primitive version of the teleological structure. Its deeper realist analysis is needed, which is the task for economic phenomenology: it identifies invariant pragmatic structures of human action, with various degrees of their anonymity. If the economic approach is founded on those structures adequately, then both rational choice theory and bounded rationality theories become compatible, as they differ in their degrees of anonymity only; they both belong to the body of the (subjectivistic) economic approach to human behavior. Economic phenomenology also offers a solution to the phenomenon of inconsistency of human action which is documented by cognitive sciences as a proof of human irrationality. The thesis shows that once the decision maker's description of the choice is allowed, inconsistency may disappear. Consistency is a matter of thinking, not acting. Therefore, a conceptual analysis of human thinking is needed. An example of the analysis is presented. It concentrates on the phenomenon of Self and works up the concept of the horizontality of Self. With this concept, inconsistency of human action is derived as a natural characteristic of our being-in-the-world. Inconsistency of human action is a pragmatic structure of human action, which even allows the decision maker some intentional control.
The Praxeology of Tadeusz Kotarbiński and its Contribution to the Economic Theory
Vosyková, Martina ; Vaverka, Tomáš (advisor) ; Hudík, Marek (referee)
This paper focuses on the characterisation of approach of Tadeusz Kotarbiński, a Polish scientist, to the praxeological thought, which is mainly based on a study of Kotarbiński's work 'Traktat o dobrej robocie'. In this work Kotarbiński formulated the basics of praxeology as a new branch of science. This paper also aims to assess the significance of Kotarbiński's praxeology for economic theory, using a confrontation of Kotarbiński's approach to praxeology with the approach of Austrian school, which had widened the term 'praxeology' into the economic field. Because of the fact, that Kotarbińsky's not intending to contribute directly to the economics, we cannot a priori expect to find any significant contributions. However, an interesting area for this examination can be the area of the rationality of conduct and the area of planning, which is widely analysed in Kotarbiński's essay 'Ogólne pojęcie planu'.
Praxeology - Historical Developement and Possible Contribution to Economic Theory
Färber, Jan ; Hudík, Marek (advisor) ; Bolcha, Peter (referee)
The goal of this work is to map the historical development of Praxeology, since its origination and then especially in the approach of Polish and Austrian tradition. It also points out some other approaches. It deals with the works of major proponents of these traditions and compares their methods, results of their works and tries to point out what would be their contributions to current economic theory.

Interested in being notified about new results for this query?
Subscribe to the RSS feed.