|
|
Risk Analysis in Relation to Various Types of Economic Experiments
Šikula, Pavel ; Škapa, Stanislav (referee) ; Janíček, Přemysl (advisor)
The diploma thesis deals with analysis of risks in relation to various focus (or types) of economic experiments. On the basis of background research suggests entirely new classification of economic experiments and subsequently examines general structure of economic experiment. Performed analysis then identifies major risks of experimental economics, analyses them and proposes possible countermeasures. Outputs of the work substantially enrich and extend current theory. Their utilization is expected in theory and practice, for purpose of scientific research or specific objectives of companies and institutions.
|
|
|
Risk Analysis in Relation to Various Types of Economic Experiments
Šikula, Pavel ; Škapa, Stanislav (referee) ; Janíček, Přemysl (advisor)
The diploma thesis deals with analysis of risks in relation to various focus (or types) of economic experiments. On the basis of background research suggests entirely new classification of economic experiments and subsequently examines general structure of economic experiment. Performed analysis then identifies major risks of experimental economics, analyses them and proposes possible countermeasures. Outputs of the work substantially enrich and extend current theory. Their utilization is expected in theory and practice, for purpose of scientific research or specific objectives of companies and institutions.
|
|
|
The Antisocial Punishment Evolution
Schejbal, Martin ; Hudík, Marek (advisor) ; Mirvald, Michal (referee)
This work statistically analyses hypotheses about the presence of antisocial punishment in study of economic experiments. Analysed data source is author's own ABM simulation of antisocial punishment environment. Tested hypotheses and ABM simulations are evolutionary oriented. This represents natural selection of evolving agents (and their groups) interacting with one another. Work is divided by two independent parts of presumptions. Crucial hypothesis of the first part is evolutional advantage from retaliatory punishment, the second part tests hypotheses of evolutional benefits resulting from group selection. Findings of the analysis allow us to accept these crucial hypothesis, and it may be concluded, that antisocial punishment can be regard as an evolutionary advantage, which directly advantages individuals, as well as whole groups.
|
guest ::
