|
|
Pre-action disclosure of information and evidence
Šindler, Matěj ; Holčapek, Tomáš (advisor) ; Dvořák, Bohumil (referee)
Pre-action disclosure of information and evidence Information asymmetry or information deficit is a phenomenon where a party to civil litigation is objectively unable to carry its burden of allegation or proof because the relevant information and evidence is completely beyond its reach and there is no way the party could have obtained it through its own activity. In such cases, there is a risk that, due to the party's information deficit, the party will not be able to seek effective judicial protection and will not be able to effectively enforce its subjective rights. Such a situation has negative consequences both for the affected party and for society as a whole, since the consistent exercise of subjective rights also provides protection to objective rights. For this reason, it is essential to address the problem of the information deficit, preferably even before litigation is initiated. The topic of overcoming the information deficit is becoming increasingly relevant, as increasingly complex legal relations between private law subjects entail more complex disputes over the law, which are often accompanied by information asymmetry between the parties to the dispute. This master's thesis explores the basis for overcoming the information deficit and the specific measures used to address this...
|
|
|
Selected issues of evidence in civil contentious proceedings
Kabát, Jakub ; Kubešová, Silvia (advisor) ; Frintová, Dita (referee)
The object of this thesis is Selected issues of evidence in civil contentious proceedings. Evidence itself occupies an important position in the civil procedure because it is a prerequisite for issuing a correct and fair court decision. The aim of this paper is to deal with the institutes of evidence procedure that lead the subjects of civil contentious proceedings for certain procedural activity in order to determine the facts and issue a decision in the case. The thesis is divided into six chapters, the first chapter includes an introduction and the last, sixth chapter includes the conclusion. The second chapter deals with basic questions of evidence in civil proceedings and is subdivided into four parts. Particular parts deal with the concept of evidence in civil proceedings, the object of evidence (which is delimited both positively and negatively), institutes facilitating the evidence in civil procedure (legal presumptions and fiction, preliminary question and discretion of the court) and the actual course of procedure of evidence in civil proceedings. The procedure of evidence is divided into several phases such as adduction of evidence, obtaining proofs, examinations of evidence by the court and finally, the evaluation of the evidence by the court. The third chapter deals with civil...
|
|
|
Cost types in adversarial civil proceedings
Zbořil, Martin ; Macková, Alena (advisor) ; Frintová, Dita (referee)
Zusammenfassung Das Thema meiner rigorosen Arbeit lautet "Die Sorten von Prozesskosten im Zivilstreitverfahren" a und ihr Ziel ist das Fokussieren auf diese Teilproblematik im Bereich von den Prozesskosten und ihre rechtliche Prüfung. Die rigorose Arbeit behandelt nicht die gesamte Gesetzregelung von den Prozesskosten, wie sie im Kopf Drei der Zivilprozessordnung geregelt wird, sondern versucht sie um eine detaillierte Analyse von den einzelnen Prozesskosten, die demonstrativ im Paragraph § 137 Abs. 1 der Zivilprozessordnung genannt wird. In der rigorosen Arbeit versuchte ich nicht nur um eine Annäherung der rechtlichen Regelung, die de lege lata in etlichen Gesetzen und Verordnungen relativ verstreut ist. Sondern fokussierte ich auch auf zahlreiche Rechtsprechung, die dieses Bereich weiter prägt. Diese Rechtsprechung darf man in die Judikatur teilen, die unklare normative Rechtsregelung konkretisiert und Rechtsprechung - fast ausschließlich seitens des Verfassungsgerichts der Tschechischen Republik - die grundlegende Gesichtspunkte und Schlussfolgerungen bringt. Dies gilt besonders für die Verordnung Nr. 484/2000 Slg., die Belohnung für die Vertretung vom Rechtsanwalt oder Notar regelt, die das Verfassungsgericht der Tschechischen Republik mit seinem Urteil aufhieb. Außerdem versuchte ich im Kapitel über...
|
|
|
Judgment by Default
Wenig, Adam ; Dvořák, Bohumil (advisor) ; Holčapek, Tomáš (referee)
1 Judgment by Default Abstract Judgment by default is a special type of a judgment on the merits, which serves as a tool against intentional delays in judicial proceedings. Due to the not negligible role of this type of a judgment, the purpose of this master's thesis is to evaluate the current state of legislation with regards to the selected fundamental theoretical aspects, historical development of the legislation, selected constitutional principles and recently proposed new legislation. The first chapter analyzes the basic theoretical foundations of default judgments. The essence of the term contumacy as well as factual presumptions, on the basis of which the courts issue default judgments, are presented therein. This chapter also explains why it is not possible to consider a default to be a procedural act of a party to proceedings and why a default judgment is only applicable in civil proceedings. Furthermore, the essential differences between judgments by default and judgments of acknowledgment are pointed out. The second chapter describes the historical development of default judgment regulation since the Roman law times. The most attention is paid to the Civil Procedure Code of 1895 because of its significant influence on the current legislation. In the third chapter, the constitutional conformity of...
|
|
|
Cost types in adversarial civil proceedings
Zbořil, Martin ; Macková, Alena (advisor) ; Frintová, Dita (referee)
Zusammenfassung Das Thema meiner rigorosen Arbeit lautet "Die Sorten von Prozesskosten im Zivilstreitverfahren" a und ihr Ziel ist das Fokussieren auf diese Teilproblematik im Bereich von den Prozesskosten und ihre rechtliche Prüfung. Die rigorose Arbeit behandelt nicht die gesamte Gesetzregelung von den Prozesskosten, wie sie im Kopf Drei der Zivilprozessordnung geregelt wird, sondern versucht sie um eine detaillierte Analyse von den einzelnen Prozesskosten, die demonstrativ im Paragraph § 137 Abs. 1 der Zivilprozessordnung genannt wird. In der rigorosen Arbeit versuchte ich nicht nur um eine Annäherung der rechtlichen Regelung, die de lege lata in etlichen Gesetzen und Verordnungen relativ verstreut ist. Sondern fokussierte ich auch auf zahlreiche Rechtsprechung, die dieses Bereich weiter prägt. Diese Rechtsprechung darf man in die Judikatur teilen, die unklare normative Rechtsregelung konkretisiert und Rechtsprechung - fast ausschließlich seitens des Verfassungsgerichts der Tschechischen Republik - die grundlegende Gesichtspunkte und Schlussfolgerungen bringt. Dies gilt besonders für die Verordnung Nr. 484/2000 Slg., die Belohnung für die Vertretung vom Rechtsanwalt oder Notar regelt, die das Verfassungsgericht der Tschechischen Republik mit seinem Urteil aufhieb. Außerdem versuchte ich im Kapitel über...
|
|
|
Selected issues of evidence in civil contentious proceedings
Kabát, Jakub ; Kubešová, Silvia (advisor) ; Frintová, Dita (referee)
The object of this thesis is Selected issues of evidence in civil contentious proceedings. Evidence itself occupies an important position in the civil procedure because it is a prerequisite for issuing a correct and fair court decision. The aim of this paper is to deal with the institutes of evidence procedure that lead the subjects of civil contentious proceedings for certain procedural activity in order to determine the facts and issue a decision in the case. The thesis is divided into six chapters, the first chapter includes an introduction and the last, sixth chapter includes the conclusion. The second chapter deals with basic questions of evidence in civil proceedings and is subdivided into four parts. Particular parts deal with the concept of evidence in civil proceedings, the object of evidence (which is delimited both positively and negatively), institutes facilitating the evidence in civil procedure (legal presumptions and fiction, preliminary question and discretion of the court) and the actual course of procedure of evidence in civil proceedings. The procedure of evidence is divided into several phases such as adduction of evidence, obtaining proofs, examinations of evidence by the court and finally, the evaluation of the evidence by the court. The third chapter deals with civil...
|
guest ::
