|
|
Special access of the radiology assistant to interventional procedures in diagnostics of oncological patients
CANDROVÁ, Daniela
In my work I deal with the peculiarities in approach of a radiology assistant to interventions in diagnostics of oncological patients. Biopsy has a special importance in diagnostics of neoplasm. It is essential for histological and cytological diagnostics. The aim of this work was to find out the incidence of bioptic interventions on oncological patients during one year at radiology department at České Budějovice hospital plc, and to compare the advantages and disadvantages of used modalities. The work proceeds from the presumption that the number of interventions carried out under the sight control without the use of ionizing radiation methods is growing. In the theoretical part of my work appear descriptions of bioptic methods of intervention radiology regarding oncology and its methods, biopsies, screening methods used at biopsy (ultrasound controlled biopsy, computer tomography controlled biopsy, magnetic resonance controlled biopsy, skiascopic controlled biopsy), instrumentarium, especially the needles used for tissue extraction (puncture and bioptic needles), characteristics of oncological patients, the principle of tumour disease, carcinogenesis, oncologically changed tissue, and basic diagnostics of oncology disease. The practical part reveals the number of biopsies performed in 2012 at České Budějovice hospital plc, under computer tomography, ultrasound and mammography machine control, and the number of other interventions on oncological patients, namely localization of impalpable breast lesion, percutaneous drainage of the urinary tract under skiascopic control. Standard methods regarding these interventions and biopsies are described focusing on the advantages and disadvantages of their use for different organs in the body. I also described radiology assistant?s work and created photo documentation of given interventions. In 2012, 96 biopsies were performed under any of the mentioned diagnostic screening methods at radiology department of České Budějovice hospital. They represent 0,06% of the total of 171 466 diagnostic interventions at this department in the respective year. At the same time they represent 3,4% of the total of 2844 interventions of the ČB radiodiagnostic department of that period. From the whole number of 96 biopsies, 79% were performed on oncological patients. No biopsies were performed under magnetic resonance or skiascopic- skiagraphic control. Since the formation of a tumour is supposed to be the main somatic risk which an individual after a low intensity radiation faces, I supposed that the number of bioptic samples taken under sight control without the use of non ionizing radiation is rising, which significantly contributes to radiation protection. It is not univocally assigned which screening method is the best for biopsy. Usually we chose the biopsy that can screen best the site in different organs and that allows the safest, the fastest and the economically most convenient procedure. The chosen method should allow the doctor chose the site for sample extraction. The choice also depends on the habits and the technical equipment of given hospital. In view of the fact that according to this work computer tomography is the most commonly used method for bioptic extractions, and under magnetic resonance control no biopsies are performed, the prestige and importance of a radiology assistant grows up, because their presence at modalities using ionizing radiation is commonly indispensable. The hypothesis of my work has not been proved. Concrete results do not support the operative hypothesis of y work. However, I can recommend concessive long-term type and multicentrically elaborated sample studies. I would be grateful if this work provided an information base for radiology assistants´ training and for interventions in the diagnostics of oncologically ill people.
|
guest ::
