|
|
Factors affecting behaviour of avian predators to hoverflies (Syrphidae) and their models (Aculeata)
Truhlářová, Marie ; Exnerová, Alice (advisor) ; Sedláček, František (referee)
Batesian mimicry is an antipredator strategy used by harmless species to mimic dangerous models by their appearance. The so-called imperfect mimics are a phenomenon within Batesian mimicry. It would be expected that Batesian mimics are selected to resemble the model as perfectly as possible. However, in some species the resemblance is very poor. The aim of this study was to test reaction of predators towards a textbook example of Batesian mimics with imperfect mimicry, i.e., hoverflies (Syrphidae) and to verify some of the hypotheses describing imperfect mimicry. We conducted two experiments in which the model predators were great tits (Parus major). The topic of the first experiment was the effect of diversity of models on categorization and generalization of hoverflies. Birds were divided into two groups, with the first group receiving high diversity of models (10 species of Hymenoptera) and second group receiving low diversity of models (2 species of Hymenoptera). There were two parts of this experiment. Categorization training when great tits learn to discriminate between two categories of prey, palatable and unpalatable and generalization test, when great tits generalized their experience from categorization training to novel prey. Palatable prey was represented by non-mimetic flies (Diptera),...
|
|
|
Evolution and function of polymorphism in warningly coloured prey
Fárová, Monika ; Exnerová, Alice (advisor) ; Šulc, Michal (referee)
Polymorphism can be expected in warningly colored prey if the prey is protected from predation by nothing else but its coloration. On the contrary, in defended prey, polymorphism was only until recently considered a controversial phenomenon due to its longer and costly avoidance learning. Individual moprhs can vary in different components of warning coloration: color, pattern, melanization degree, and internal and external contrast of colour patterns. This makes it difficult for predators to learn and remember warning signals of defended prey and avoid it in the future. Predator selection pressures and mechanisms leading to polymorphism differ between defended and undefended prey. For undefended prey, it is a negative frequency-depended selection that supports rare morphs or the multiple models hypothesis for one mimetic species. For defended prey, the polymorphism can occur temporarily (i. e., be unstable) and it also can be allowed by spatial heterogeneity of morphs or, as for undefended prey, one species can mimic multiple models. Quasi-Batesian mimesis could also contribute to the existence of the polymorphism, due to mechanisms similar to those in unprotected prey. Apart from selection by predators, there are other factors, that contribute to the existence of polymorhism in prey warning...
|
|
|
Mechanisms and effectiveness of antipredatory defences within red-and-black mimetic complex
Kotlíková, Lucie ; Exnerová, Alice (advisor) ; Baňař, Petr (referee)
Strikingly coloured species can form mimetic complexes. One of them is an extensive black-and-red mimetic complex in the Palearctic region. It consists of representatives across arthropod taxa with different levels of defense and investment in it. To describe individual mimetic relationships in this complex, it is necessary to know the effectiveness of these defense mechanisms against predators. Reactions of individual predators vary considerably. Differences in reactions primarily depend on the ability to perceive some components of defense, using sensory and cognitive abilities. Mechanisms and effectiveness of antipredatory defence are the subject of numerous studies, but there is still a lack of description of some mechanisms among many representatives forming this mimetic complex. For this reason, further studies are needed to allow the derivation of mimetic relationships prevailing in this mimetic complex in the future. Keywords: mimicry, aposematism, antipredatory defense, colouration, mimetic complex
|
|
|
Evolution and function of polymorphism in warningly coloured prey
Fárová, Monika ; Exnerová, Alice (advisor) ; Šulc, Michal (referee)
Polymorphism can be expected in warningly colored prey if the prey is protected from predation by nothing else but its coloration. On the contrary, in defended prey, polymorphism was only until recently considered a controversial phenomenon due to its longer and costly avoidance learning. Individual moprhs can vary in different components of warning coloration: color, pattern, melanization degree, and internal and external contrast of colour patterns. This makes it difficult for predators to learn and remember warning signals of defended prey and avoid it in the future. Predator selection pressures and mechanisms leading to polymorphism differ between defended and undefended prey. For undefended prey, it is a negative frequency-depended selection that supports rare morphs or the multiple models hypothesis for one mimetic species. For defended prey, the polymorphism can occur temporarily (i. e., be unstable) and it also can be allowed by spatial heterogeneity of morphs or, as for undefended prey, one species can mimic multiple models. Quasi-Batesian mimesis could also contribute to the existence of the polymorphism, due to mechanisms similar to those in unprotected prey. Apart from selection by predators, there are other factors, that contribute to the existence of polymorhism in prey warning...
|
|
|
Reactions of spider and insect predators to aposematic prey
Koláčná, Klára ; Exnerová, Alice (advisor) ; Sentenská, Lenka (referee)
Aposematic prey advertises its unprofitability to predators by means of warning signals, which can be visual, chemical, acoustic or combined with each other as multimodal signals. Most experimental studies dealing with responses of predators to aposematic prey focus on vertebrates, especially birds. This thesis focuses on the most frequently tested groups of terrestrial arthropod predators - spiders, dragonflies, and mantises - supplemented by less tested insect predators. Most of the tested arthropod predators are able to learn to avoid noxious aposematic prey based on either visual, olfactory or acoustic signals depending on their perception. Some can remember this aversion for several days. Only in case of jumping spiders, ability to generalise previous experience with a particular prey to similar prey has been confirmed. Prey chemical defenses most often consist of cardenolides or aldehydes, which proved to be aversive for tested arthropod predators.
|
guest ::
