|
|
Comparision of Seam Forge and Spring Roo Tools
Navláčil, Ondřej ; Smrčka, Aleš (referee) ; Kočí, Radek (advisor)
The goal of this bachelor's thesis is to compare the rapid application development tools Spring Roo and JBoss Forge and to deploy created applications on the JBoss AS application server. The first part this thesis describes an evolution of Java EE platform, evolution of tools and frameworks for rapid application development and also reasons for a need of these tools in Java EE platform. The second part describes creation of simple applications with the same functionality using Spring Roo and JBoss Forge. The second part also compares their capabilities in various aspects like testing support, applying these tools on already started projects or support in integrated development environments.
|
|
|
Comparision of Seam Forge and Spring Roo Tools
Navláčil, Ondřej ; Smrčka, Aleš (referee) ; Kočí, Radek (advisor)
The goal of this bachelor's thesis is to compare the rapid application development tools Spring Roo and JBoss Forge and to deploy created applications on the JBoss AS application server. The first part this thesis describes an evolution of Java EE platform, evolution of tools and frameworks for rapid application development and also reasons for a need of these tools in Java EE platform. The second part describes creation of simple applications with the same functionality using Spring Roo and JBoss Forge. The second part also compares their capabilities in various aspects like testing support, applying these tools on already started projects or support in integrated development environments.
|
|
|
A comparison of the web Rapid Application Development frameworks Ruby on Rails and Spring Roo
Jindráček, Petr ; Pavlíčková, Jarmila (advisor) ; Šlajchrt, Zbyněk (referee)
The topic of this master's thesis is a comparison of web Rapid Application Development frameworks Ruby on Rails and Spring Roo. The paper focuses on creating extensive overview of pros and cons of the subjected tools from the web developer's point of view to enhance his awareness about the subject, also to come up with new questions for further analysis or even convince him to use one of the frameworks in the real projects. Firstly, the paper contains a theoretical overview of the common conceptions for better understanding of the following parts and then specific principles for each of the selected frameworks. Secondly, there is a practical part. On one hand it demonstrates the implementation of a reference application using both platforms to illustrate the practical distinctions. On the other hand, it also contains an overall comparison based on the defined methodology. Altogether, it should form a comprehensive comparison of the selected frameworks for web developers interested in Ruby and Java platforms.
|
guest ::
