Home > Search Results: 999C1a:1N04144
Search:
Search Tips :: Advanced Search
Search collections:
Sort by: Display results: Output format:
National Repository of Grey Literature 1 records found  Search took 0.00 seconds. 
Do we evaluate the research profesionally?
 Ráb, Petr ; Kadlecová, Ivana
The science and research undoubtedly are the most powerful tools of human civilization and the expenses allocated in belong to optimal investment at all. The identification of top research areas, organization, teams and/or indviduals has therefore crucial importance for allocation of financial resources. The evaluation of research quality is then key factor. However, the evaluation of research quality and output is a complex problem due to nature of research processes. The research achievement has two inherent components: quality (= what was done) and quantity (= how much was done). While the first component is evaluated by peer review systems, the later is based on database with scientific informations nad/or derived from them indicators. Quantity data (indicators) are always core parameters of evaluation systems, frequently used without peer review.This contributions dealst with some problems with databases and indicators application in R,T and D evaluations.
Detailed record

Interested in being notified about new results for this query?
Subscribe to the RSS feed.
Digital Repository :: Search :: Submit :: Personalize :: Help
Powered by Invenio v1.1.2
Maintained by admin.invenio@techlib.cz
This site is also available in the following languages:
Česky  English