|
|
Brussel I Regulation and other procedural laws of European private international law
Johnová, Gabriela ; Brodec, Jan (advisor) ; Pfeiffer, Magdalena (referee)
Topic of this diploma thesis is "Brussels I Regulation and other procedural laws of European private international law". The thesis focuses on the analysis of the problems that its name suggests. The procedural rules of private international law underwent during the past fifteen years relatively significant changes. Due to the application of the principles of free movement of persons, capital, goods and services, it results necessary to develop effective instruments for performing the law accross the member states borders. It occurs in procedural area primarily through the adoption of instruments of the European secondary legislation, particularly through regulation. The most important and most widely used procedural rules of European private international law was until recently Regulation (EC) no. 44/2001 of the 22nd December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, which was since the 10th of January 2015 replaced by the regulation of the European Parliament and Council Regulation (EU) no. 1215/2012 of the 12th December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. The subject of this paper is to examine the procedural rules of European private international law with a particular...
|
|
|
Future of the European Private International Law
Johnová, Gabriela ; Trávníčková, Zuzana (advisor) ; Grmelová, Nicole (referee)
The European international private law has undergone a dynamic development during the last twenty years. It can be assumed that this development will continue con-sidering the increasing need for dealing with the legal relations involving a cross-border element, which arise thanks to the exercise of the freedom of movement of goods, capital, services, and people in the frame of the European Union. The experts in international private law discuss the directions of its future development. Should it continue the same or similar direction as until now, i.e. the unification of individual in-struments and conclusion of international agreements (limited with the EU competen-ces), or should it take the direction of a comprehensive codification of the European conflict of laws? The last considered direction is the adoption of a comprehensive common code on private law, i.e. a code of the private substantive law rules. Neverthe-less, this possibility deals with the diversity of the law cultures and the law orders among the EU member states.
|
guest ::
