|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Preliminary measures and receiving evidence
Drbohlavová, Šárka ; Winterová, Alena (advisor) ; Frintová, Dita (referee)
This rigorous work deals with institute of preliminary measures and institute of receiving evidence, which has been handled at second Catch of first Part of Rules of Civil Procedure. The preliminary measures have provisory function in the time prior to a decision is passed or more precisely prior to force of law of this decision or even on a very start of legal process, i.e. in the time when there does not exist any decision about the law which will be ensured by a court in the future. The preliminary measures can be ordered by the court on the proposal in the time when there arose a need to provisionally treat the interrelations between party to an action or in the case if there is a doubt that the execution of a judgment could be threatened. The description of the preliminary measures is exemplarily described in the provision of Section 76. Rules of Civil Procedure among others govern special types of the preliminary measures: the provision of Section 76a preliminary measure in the case of minors and the provision of Section 76b preliminary measure in the case of domestic abuse. The preliminary measures are also governed in special laws such as Act on Insolvency and Its Resolution No. 182/2006 Coll., Family Act No. 94/1963 Coll., Asylum Act No. 325/1999 Coll. The procedure in which the court decides about...
|
|
|
Execution of property
Beránek, Petr ; Winterová, Alena (advisor) ; Frintová, Dita (referee)
The subject matter of the paper was chosen in consideration of its topicality for society and urgency for each individual. The distraint of movable property is generally considered the least pleasant device of the execution of a court judgment, causing fear and trepidation in the public eye. It is worth mentioning, however, that this method of judgment execution gives rise to a host of prejudices mightily stirred up by scandalous media coverage. The paper aims, among other things, to expose the prejudices as false. The paper is structured so that the introductory section treats the general aspects of the execution proceedings as they relate to all the statutory methods of judgment execution, emphasizing the specific features of the execution by selling the movable property items. Though the paper is centered around a detailed analysis of how the judgment is executed through the sale of the movable items, I thought it necessary to at least touch these general facts, whose knowledge is a prerequisite for better understanding of the entire judgment execution performed by selling the movables. The second section of the paper presents in-detail investigation of this form of the judgment execution in view of the amended provisions of the Civil Procedure Code and the available judicial decisions by the...
|
|
| |
|
|
Appeal in civil trial
Plhal, Milan ; Winterová, Alena (advisor) ; Macková, Alena (referee)
VIII. Résumé International documents and constitutional legislation impose a duty on the Czech Republic to provide everybody without exception with the right to judicial protection, fair decision and the enforcement of imposed duties. The Czech Republic performs the duty mentioned above by means of the law- courts which are required to act upon the Civil Procedure Code. The Civil Procedure Code therefore represents the instrument of enforcement of law that is the background to the fair judicial decisions in the constitutional, legal procedural and substantive framework. The legal procedural framework is represented by the principles of due and fair process (article 36 et sequentia of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms) the integral part of which is also the right to hear a law case without reasonable delays, or (if you like) the right to settle a case by court in reasonable time, as resulting from the established practice of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic. The Civil Procedure Code is the law which is supposed to connect all these requirements, thus to guarantee the quick, flexible and fair judicial proceedings crowned with the fair decision. If the judicial proceeding fails to perform these duties, it should not prevent the courts from complying with these requirements at least. As described...
|
|
|
Grounds for remedial measures (a comparison)
Kukrálová, Anna ; Winterová, Alena (advisor) ; Frintová, Dita (referee)
57 V. kapitola - Závěr 5.1. Vztah opravných prostředků 5.1.1. Řádné a mimořádné opravné prostředky Řádné a mimořádné opravné prostředky se liší zejména intenzitou, s jakou je jejich prostřednictvím zasahováno do právního postavení osob, jichž se týká napadané rozhodnutí. Tím jsou také dány požadavky, které musí být splněny pro to, aby opravný prostředek mohl být s úspěchem uplatněn u soudu a rovněž rozsah, v jakém lze opravný prostředek uplatnit. Všechny mimořádné opravné prostředky jsou zásahem do soudem dříve autoritativně určených práv a povinností, vzhledem k tomu je jejich uplatnění vázáno na přísnější podmínky než je tomu u odvolání jako opravného prostředku, který směřuje proti rozhodnutím nepravomocným. V souladu s právě uvedeným platí, že odvolání musí splňovat pouze základní formální náležitosti a musí v něm být individualizováno rozhodnutí, proti němuž směřuje spolu s uvedením odvolacího důvodu a odvolacího návrhu, tedy toho, čeho se odvolatel svým podáním domáhá. Odvolací důvod přitom představují pro účastníka spíše než omezení návod, jak podání formulovat. O omezení se nejedná proto, že odvolací důvody zahrnují takřka veškeré možné varianty pochybení a nedostatků, kterými rozhodnutí soudu může být stiženo. Totéž platí i u rozsudku pro uznání a rozsudku pro zmeškání - občanský soudní řád sice...
|
|
| |
|
| |
guest ::
