|
| |
|
|
Scaling utilization in landscape evaluation
Burešová, Renata
The aim of this work was to compare the effect of different scale mapping methods on the landscape evaluation (by Biotope Valuation Metod) and define the area for which it is necessary to use fine pattern mapping and when is possible to use rough pattern mapping. Two mapping methods, different in the pattern size (Natura 2000 with fine pattern size and Corine Land-Cover with rough pattern size) were choosen.
|
|
|
Scaling utilization in landscape evaluation
Burešová, Renata
The aim of this work was to compare the effect of different scale mapping methods on the landscape evaluation (by Biotope Valuation Metod) and define the area for which it is necessary to use fine pattern mapping and when is possible to use rough pattern mapping. Two mapping methods, different in the pattern size (Natura 2000 with fine pattern size and Corine Land-Cover with rough pattern size) were choosen.
|
|
|
Efekt různých měřítek a podrobností mapování na hodnocení krajiny
Prokopová, Marcela ; Burešová, Renata ; Seják, J. ; Cudlín, Pavel
The main purpose of this paper is examining the utilization of various mapping data for biotope evaluation by BVM (biotope valuation method, modified from Hessian method). The evaluation of landscape segments of different size was performed and compared while using mapping data of different scale (Corine LC and NATURA 2000 mapping). The result shows advisable combinations of map extent and mapping data for biotope evaluation in order to maximize the effectivity and leave the high information value.
|
|
|
Biotopes evaluation and assessing using Natura 2000 mapping system
Cudlín, Pavel ; Kučera, Tomáš ; Prokopová, Marcela ; Francírková, Tereza ; Burešová, Renata ; Smrž, T. ; Boucníková, Eva ; Hellebrandová, K. ; Petříček, V. ; Dejmal, I. ; Seják, J.
For creating price maps, data from NATURA 2000 mapping system are useful and they give topographically more accurate data than CORINE Land Cover. Nevertheless the total price differed very slightly, probably because of the studied area was large enough. Individual evaluation changed the total value mainly in case of natural and close to nature biotopes. The total value of the whole area was changed by only approximately 2 or 5% (according to used procedure of data transfer). It means that individual evaluation could be ignored for price map formation, in the last resort.
|
guest ::
RSS feed.