|
|
Unification of the testing process in banking company
Cestr, Jan ; Pavlíčková, Jarmila (advisor) ; Novák, Filip (referee)
In the present, there are several programmes used for testing in this company. This may lead to a certain mutual inconsistency of the data within the system, as well as to the decrease of orientation and efficiency among the employees, that are in charge of the quality of the developed applications. There is approximately 200 employees in the IT department who focus on the development of the software. The biggest percentage has, though, the position of the tester. The aim of this thesis is to analyse the situation and the testing process in the selected bank company. Simultaneously, we would like to reach certain possibilities to unify the process of testing.
|
|
|
Application Lifecycle Management - products comparison
Jandl, Jiří ; Kunstová, Renáta (advisor) ; Štěpán, Radek (referee)
This work focuses on Application lifecycle management (ALM) tools. The goal of the work is to describe Polarion ALM 2012 tool and compare it's functional areas, their relations, their collaboration and coverage of ALM definition with other tools on the ALM market by IBM and HP. The main functions of specific ALM areas are reviewed taking into account the aspects of team collaboration, process documentation, information sharing, configuration possibilities, creating artifacts options, linking and traceability options. The contribution of this work is commented comparison of several ALM tools made by market leaders with tool made by Polarion. First part describes the ALM platform on general level. The second part describes Polarion ALM 2012 solution. The third part compares HP ALM 11 and IBM Rational Team Concert Enterprise 3.0 tools with Polarion ALM 2012 tool.
|
|
|
Software team development and its support by Microsoft Team Foundation Server
Kryštovský, Ladislav ; Stanovská, Iva (advisor) ; Buchalcevová, Alena (referee)
The work objective is review usability of specific ALM system for team software development. Work is structured into four parts. In first part I will clarify the principles of team development. In second part I will compare CASE tools and ALM systems in aspect of team development and then define functionality which ALM system have to provide to development team. In next part is introduced ALM system from Microsoft -- Visual Studio Team System. In final part I describe and rate a functionality of this system. Rating itself is based on comparing the actual functionality of the specific system with functionality defined in second part.
|
guest ::
