|
|
European Arrest Warrant in Theory and Practice
Sikorská, Eliška ; Grmelová, Nicole (advisor) ; Žák, Květoslav (referee)
The bachelor thesis deals with the European Arrest Warrant in theory and practice. In the theoretical part, the thesis is primarily focused on the legal regulation of the international judicial cooperation in criminal matters within the European Union, its development from a historical perspective and its current status. In the second part, the thesis deals with the practical performance of the European Arrest Warrant and with the related complications. The issue here is, that after ten years of the enforcement of the European Arrest Warrant, many doubts over its performance and subsequent impact on the fundamental rights of citizens have raised.
|
|
|
European Arrest Warrant – Comparison of the Extradition and the European Arrest Warrant
Klimová, Kateřina ; Druláková, Radka (advisor) ; Novotná, Markéta (referee)
The Framework decision on the European Arrest Warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (2002/584/SVV) adopted by the Council of the European Union on 13th June 2002 established the institute of the European Arrest Warrant between Member States which completely replaced existing extradition procedures between the Member States of the European Union. The implementation of the European Arrest Warrant was caused both by increasing cross-border criminality and terrorist attacks on September 11th 2001 in the USA. The aim of its implementation was to increase the efficiency of the existing extradition procedures between EU Member States. The Bachelor thesis titled: "European Arrest Warrant -- Comparison of the Extradition and the European Arrest Warrant" pursues a comparison of the European Arrest Warrant and classic extraditon procedures on the ground of comparing principles of both institutes. It emphasizes an important principle during the implementation of the European Arrest Warrant which is the principle of mutual recognition of judicial decisions. Furthermore, this thesis analyses benefits and shortcomings of the European Arrest Warrant. The shortcomings appear primarily in the practical implementation of the European Arrest Warrant, but its benefit is considerably bigger, so rightfully it is a breakthrough legal norm.
|
|
|
European Arrest Warrant and Its Application in Practice
Jarošová, Simona ; Druláková, Radka (advisor) ; Trávníčková, Zuzana (referee)
The bachelor thesis deals with the european arrast warrant which has replaced traditional extradiction process ciritcized for being too formal and too slow. Therefore, many changes have been included in the new instrument which should help to make the warrant faster and more effective. It is these changes that is the main focus of the work. Its aim is to assess the contribution of introduction and application of the european arrast warrant. The assessment will be carried out first theoretically and then on the example of the so called Qatari prince case. The first part of the text specifies the content of the framework decision, the second chapter then describes its practical application in the Czech republic. The following chapter is concerned with the aspects of practical application of the warrant in the form of statistics and the analysis of the mentioned changes. The last part applies the theoratical findings to the case of Qatari prince.
|
|
| |
|
|
Practical operation of the European arrest warrant in the EU
Skleničková, Lucie ; Druláková, Radka (advisor) ; Trávníčková, Zuzana (referee)
This thesis deals with European arrest warrant both in general and, primarily, in praxis. In the first part it describes historical development of the judicial cooperation leading to the adoption of the Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant. Then the European arrest warrant and extradition are compared and its key principles encapsulated. Further, the thesis discusses problems which occurred during implementation of this instrument in some of the Member states of the EU. Last chapter of this thesis offers a study of practical operation of the European arrest warrant. It is focused particularly on the number of European arrest warrants, willingness of the states to apply the possibilities established in the Framework decision, the ways of transmitting European arrest warrants and respecting of the given time limits.
|
|
|
Implementation of European Arrest Warrant
Žakarovská, Barbara ; Druláková, Radka (advisor) ; Dubský, Zbyněk (referee)
The European Arrest Warrant was the necessary response to the increase in cross-border crime, which had been a result produced by the liquidation of the internal state boundary. Furthermore it represents a fully new system of judicial cooperation in criminal matters among the Member States of European Union, based on principle of mutual trust and on the principle of recognition of judicial decisions and judgments. At the first stage the thesis "Implementation of European Arrest Warrant" describes the historical events marking or directly leading the adoption of the Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States by the Council of the European Union on 13th June 2002. Then major differences between this new institute and its former legislation, extradition procedures, are being analyzed. The main part is being focused on problems that occurred during transposition of the named Framework decision into Member States' internal law systems, from time, content and constitutional compliance point of view while with this last the complications that Czech republic, Germany, Poland and Belgium faced are being described. Even though no doubts that the implementation of European Arrest Warrant encountered a lot of troubles we can not simply deny that it made enormously the whole process of surrender more easy and quicker which was absolutely needed in these times of increasing cross-border criminality and real danger of terrorism while the old extradition procedures were fully obsolete and too formal. The new European Arrest Warrant then represents a simple mandatory logical step forward.
|
guest ::
