|
|
Comparing of the Police ČR and Metropolitan police competences, objectives and education system with the view to more intensive cooperation between the both institutions.
ŠKOLKOVÁ, Věra
This thesis deals with the tasks, activities, competences and education system of police and city police in order to comparing and proposing of the methodological tools for effective and efficient cooperation between the two components. Although each component has a very different structure and organization and substantive and territorial jurisdiction, activities of city police in some areas closely linked with the activities of police (supervision of public order in the city) or it is linked to the activities of police (reporting of crimes the police). Currently, there is necessary that the both components cooperated with one another, have functional channels and are constantly informed about important matters that take place within the activity of the components (police inform about search persons, about robberies, burglaries). Similarly, the education system and its form in the police and local police is very different simply because the police as a component of the state is organized from the central level, while the individual city police is controlled from the local level. Therefore depends on the decision of who controls the local city police, what kind of above standard training would provide police officers and what funds can allocate to this training. Currently, many city police have more available funds for equipment, instrumentation or training than the police, but on the other side missing some permissions that would help them operate more efficiently. The minor modification of an existing legislative authority of the municipal police would often resolve cases without the same time necessary police assistance The aim of this thesis is to outline how the city police could cooperate with the police more intensively and effectively in cities, provided that they solved some minor problems, and also propose optimal level of police officeres training in cities.
|
|
|
"Psychology of the crowd during crisis situations - how is able to dispose with that one. (Law and psychological aspects.)"
ŠKOLKOVÁ, Věra
Use of scientific knowledge in crowd psychology is low-level presently. Even the individual branches of the Integrated Rescue System (IRS) do not use crowd psychology, in most cases, for dealing with crisis situations. The fundamental factor in understanding crowd psychology is the fact that crowd is a social aggregate and someone{\crq}s presence in a crowd gives rise to new qualities different from those of individuals present in a crowd. The rise of special qualities of a crowd is caused by the feeling of insurmountable power, psychic contagion and suggestibility of its members. The aim of this paper was, apart from others, to explode the myths about crowd qualities that are supported by numerous psychologists and authors of sociology textbooks. The assertion that a crowd is spontaneous, suggestible and emotional has been refuted by scientific research into a crowd and by logic thinking. Crisis situations often threaten human health and lives or, at least, property must be protected and the understanding of crowd psychology may facilitate the elimination of such consequences. That is why education is important, particularly in the branches of the IRS that deal with acute situations, whether it is a demonstration or a natural disaster. The objective should be the ability of each IRS member to become a ``leader of a crowd{\crq}q and to influence the crowd so that the situation could be dealt with wih the least possible impacts on human health and life or property. It is not sufficient to be aware of crowd psychology in light of its psychological aspects. It is important to learn about them in terms of its legal aspects that are inevitable for the present-day society and maintaining public law and order. A crowd that acts under the impression of anonymity must be made aware that this phenomenon is not so explicit any more and that each individual, howbeit part of a crowd, is legally punishable for their behaviour and acting.
|
guest ::
