|
|
Battery rescue equipment compared to hydraulic rescue tools in the Fire Protection Units of the South Bohemian Region Fire Rescue Department.
JIRSA, Marek
In my bachelor thesis I am dealing with hydraulic rescue equipment with motor or electric drive unit and battery rescue equipment for fire protection units of the Fire Rescue Department of the South Bohemia Region. In this thesis I focused on the comparison of hydraulic and battery rescue equipment. In the thesis I have listed the basic legal regulations that define the tasks of the Fire Rescue Department of the Czech Republic, such as Act No. 320/2015 Coll. on the Fire Rescue Department of the Czech Republic and on amendments to certain acts. I have tried to answer the question whether the battery rescue equipment is comparable to the original hydraulic rescue equipment in the long term, user and operational terms, and also to determine if the battery rescue equipment has met the assumptions of usability in relation to the original hydraulic rescue equipment. I expressed my own opinion at the end of the thesis, where I evaluated everything. Based on the questionnaires, I found that the battery rescue equipment has a positive rating in many respects, but there are also negative ratings. However, we also find pros and cons for the hydraulic rescue equipment. In the overall evaluation, however, the battery rescue equipment was on a par or even better than the hydraulic rescue equipment. According to this survey, it can be seen that the development of the battery rescue equipment is moving in the right direction and could be used independently in the future without a hydraulic rescue equipment. But in order for this to be the case, according to the opinions of the respondents, it is necessary to wait a few more years to catch the negative moments, to see if there are any tool failures or other problems that threaten the operation of these types of tools.
|
guest ::
