|
|
Completion of the area Údolní 53 for the Faculty of Architecture and Faculty of Fine Arts
Vaňková, Kristýna ; Havlík, Darina (referee) ; Makovský, Zdeněk (advisor)
The aim of this work is to create arts campus for the Faculty of fine arts and Faculty of Architecture from the complex of buildings of BUT at Údolní street. Current buildings (formerly army barracks houses) don't have sufficient capacity and are not suitable for the arts departments. Inner part of the campus is nowadays without urbanistic concept and is formed of many buildings of differnt purposes. This work deals with the urbanistic solution of the campus, new use of the current buildings and creation of the new buildings, needed for teaching and exhibitions. I am adding annexes to the historical buildings that will be used by artists. There is main entrance and common gallery in the center of those buildings on the busy crossroad. In the inner part of the campus, between buildings of Faculty of Fine Arts and Faculty of Architecture, there will be the gipsoteca and drawing rooms that will be used by both faculties.
|
|
|
Completion of the area Údolní 53 for the Faculty of Architecture and Faculty of Fine Arts
Stejskal, Ivo ; Kubínová, Šárka (referee) ; Makovský, Zdeněk (advisor)
It is necessary to ask the question of the relationship and the corresponding forms of buildings of the faculty of architecture and faculty of fine arts with the public. Due to the efforts of the faculties to open up to the public, I find it undesirable to place new objects in the courtyard and hide behind the walls of historic buildings. Much more meaningful is the use of existing buildings at the boundary of the plot. It is important to protect our history, but the protection of existing buildings should not get to the point where it will defend the presence, be on the same level, and thus ensure its quality and together to shape the future. The newly allocated creative use of the original barracks has greater demands on space, whether capacity or its generosity. Therefore, it is necessary to customize the objects for the current function. The superstructure will help keep faculties in one building. An advantage is also the connection to existing networks or vertical communications. The proposed minimalist intervention is in contrast to the historic building, making it stand out, while the verticalism of the superstructure raises the object of the original barracks to the desired institution of the Faculty of Architecture and the Faculty of Fine Arts.
|
|
|
Completion of the area Údolní 53 for the Faculty of Architecture and Faculty of Fine Arts
Vaňková, Kristýna ; Havlík, Darina (referee) ; Makovský, Zdeněk (advisor)
The aim of this work is to create arts campus for the Faculty of fine arts and Faculty of Architecture from the complex of buildings of BUT at Údolní street. Current buildings (formerly army barracks houses) don't have sufficient capacity and are not suitable for the arts departments. Inner part of the campus is nowadays without urbanistic concept and is formed of many buildings of differnt purposes. This work deals with the urbanistic solution of the campus, new use of the current buildings and creation of the new buildings, needed for teaching and exhibitions. I am adding annexes to the historical buildings that will be used by artists. There is main entrance and common gallery in the center of those buildings on the busy crossroad. In the inner part of the campus, between buildings of Faculty of Fine Arts and Faculty of Architecture, there will be the gipsoteca and drawing rooms that will be used by both faculties.
|
|
|
Completion of the area Údolní 53 for the Faculty of Architecture and Faculty of Fine Arts
Stejskal, Ivo ; Kubínová, Šárka (referee) ; Makovský, Zdeněk (advisor)
It is necessary to ask the question of the relationship and the corresponding forms of buildings of the faculty of architecture and faculty of fine arts with the public. Due to the efforts of the faculties to open up to the public, I find it undesirable to place new objects in the courtyard and hide behind the walls of historic buildings. Much more meaningful is the use of existing buildings at the boundary of the plot. It is important to protect our history, but the protection of existing buildings should not get to the point where it will defend the presence, be on the same level, and thus ensure its quality and together to shape the future. The newly allocated creative use of the original barracks has greater demands on space, whether capacity or its generosity. Therefore, it is necessary to customize the objects for the current function. The superstructure will help keep faculties in one building. An advantage is also the connection to existing networks or vertical communications. The proposed minimalist intervention is in contrast to the historic building, making it stand out, while the verticalism of the superstructure raises the object of the original barracks to the desired institution of the Faculty of Architecture and the Faculty of Fine Arts.
|
guest ::
