|
|
Revitalization of the Central Station and the Underpass Beneath
Richter, Jiří ; Pavlovský, Tomáš (referee) ; Havliš, Karel (advisor)
Current Status Because we are waiting for transfer of the station, the railway is in a deplorable state. Technical and capacity (we can check 30 000 passengers per hour, during the fair is required 50 000 passengers per hour). During the reconstruction is needed to create a network of stations that are interconnected with the public transport. The train will become part of public transport and reduce the burden on the main station node. Move or don't move? The question which is difficult to answer. Both options have their advantages and disadvantages, and they are changing over time. The situation has changed very much in the advent of the financial crisis. Therefore, it should be professional discussion leading to the optimal solution. This does not happen, politicians are divided into two groups already know in advance that their pproposal is the best. Afterwards, looking for a reasons. I decided to check the option not move. The biggest drawback of this option is problematic construction (in service or temporary move). The biggest advantage is its link to public transport and the proximity to the town. Region Connection to the region is very important for me. This I see as a advantage of Brno, which should be further developed. Together with the development of public transport, automobile transport should be reduced. Barrier My work is trying to disprove the idea that the railway creates a barrier. On the contrary, I try to look at rail as a place that connects. Not only each stop, but the parts of the town as well. Construction Reinforced concrete arches are arranged in a triangle layout, creating a spatial truss. There is a train station in it. Trains ar placed on it. Typology The station is treated as free space, which is subsequently filled with different functions.These functions may be, if necessary, modified.
|
|
|
Garden city
Baršová, Monika ; Pavlun, Martin (referee) ; Toman, Radek (advisor)
The aim of this bachelor’s thesis is to design a modern housing in a garden city according to contemporary standards and their potential overrun to the future. The garden city is a part of the recently designed area in southern Brno city centre based on a study made by the association Ivan Koleček – Pavel Jura, architects Lausanne-Brno. The final design consists of two apartment buildings joined with continuous park. It interconnects the functions of living and public amenity in a relationship of humans with the place and of the place itself with the new surrounding green area and public or semi-public spaces. Simultaneously, there is an effort to blur the perception of the inside and outside world and the strict separation of it.
|
|
|
ART & ARCHITECTURE - Community Entertainment Facility in South Centre, Brno ("FIESTA" Concert and Dance Hall )
Korábová, Nikola ; Todorov, Petr (referee) ; Pelčák, Petr (advisor)
Within the plans on redevelopment of Brno south centre a linear green park is envisaged with a piece of land designated for a major cultural venue as defined in the masterplan. Fiesta Centre for music and dance is a diploma project engaged in the theme of a city-wide cultural venue. It has been designed in a compact form with an elliptical layout so as to make up with the difficulties of the site. The building’s facade has a strong arched structure setting up a landmark in the park. The park is integral to the design. The auditorium provides with 970 seats and the stage is fitted with an elevating device to maximize the flexibility of the performance. Design includes foyers and the other visitors facilities, necessary staff and delivery background. 200 parking plots are placed in the underground.
|
|
|
Garden city
Baršová, Monika ; Pavlun, Martin (referee) ; Toman, Radek (advisor)
The aim of this bachelor’s thesis is to design a modern housing in a garden city according to contemporary standards and their potential overrun to the future. The garden city is a part of the recently designed area in southern Brno city centre based on a study made by the association Ivan Koleček – Pavel Jura, architects Lausanne-Brno. The final design consists of two apartment buildings joined with continuous park. It interconnects the functions of living and public amenity in a relationship of humans with the place and of the place itself with the new surrounding green area and public or semi-public spaces. Simultaneously, there is an effort to blur the perception of the inside and outside world and the strict separation of it.
|
|
|
ART & ARCHITECTURE - Community Entertainment Facility in South Centre, Brno ("FIESTA" Concert and Dance Hall )
Korábová, Nikola ; Todorov, Petr (referee) ; Pelčák, Petr (advisor)
Within the plans on redevelopment of Brno south centre a linear green park is envisaged with a piece of land designated for a major cultural venue as defined in the masterplan. Fiesta Centre for music and dance is a diploma project engaged in the theme of a city-wide cultural venue. It has been designed in a compact form with an elliptical layout so as to make up with the difficulties of the site. The building’s facade has a strong arched structure setting up a landmark in the park. The park is integral to the design. The auditorium provides with 970 seats and the stage is fitted with an elevating device to maximize the flexibility of the performance. Design includes foyers and the other visitors facilities, necessary staff and delivery background. 200 parking plots are placed in the underground.
|
|
|
Revitalization of the Central Station and the Underpass Beneath
Richter, Jiří ; Pavlovský, Tomáš (referee) ; Havliš, Karel (advisor)
Current Status Because we are waiting for transfer of the station, the railway is in a deplorable state. Technical and capacity (we can check 30 000 passengers per hour, during the fair is required 50 000 passengers per hour). During the reconstruction is needed to create a network of stations that are interconnected with the public transport. The train will become part of public transport and reduce the burden on the main station node. Move or don't move? The question which is difficult to answer. Both options have their advantages and disadvantages, and they are changing over time. The situation has changed very much in the advent of the financial crisis. Therefore, it should be professional discussion leading to the optimal solution. This does not happen, politicians are divided into two groups already know in advance that their pproposal is the best. Afterwards, looking for a reasons. I decided to check the option not move. The biggest drawback of this option is problematic construction (in service or temporary move). The biggest advantage is its link to public transport and the proximity to the town. Region Connection to the region is very important for me. This I see as a advantage of Brno, which should be further developed. Together with the development of public transport, automobile transport should be reduced. Barrier My work is trying to disprove the idea that the railway creates a barrier. On the contrary, I try to look at rail as a place that connects. Not only each stop, but the parts of the town as well. Construction Reinforced concrete arches are arranged in a triangle layout, creating a spatial truss. There is a train station in it. Trains ar placed on it. Typology The station is treated as free space, which is subsequently filled with different functions.These functions may be, if necessary, modified.
|
guest ::
