|
|
Exercise of parental responsibility
ŠULISTA, Michal
This bachelor's thesis deals with the execution of parental responsibility and mainly the description of the Cochem model, which is closely related to this execution. It aims to describe and analyse the execution of parental responsibility and details related to this issue. Above all, describe the basic relationships between parents and children in connection with the execution of parental responsibility, parental responsibility as such and possible resolution of conflicts, which includes a description of the Cochem practice. The thesis is divided into two parts, namely the theoretical and practical parts. The theoretical part consists of the definition of basic concepts that relate to the issue of parental responsibility. The next chapter consists of a description of parental responsibility to the child and discusses its implementation in cases where parents live together and not. Furthermore, the theoretical part deals with the resolution of parental conflicts in court and out of court. The final part of the theoretic definition concerns the Cochem method, mainly the official German definition, and next, the description of this practice in the Czech Republic. There is a comparison of both applications of Cochem practice. Furthermore, the work provides an insight into the pros and cons of the issue and the results in possible proposals and measures to improve the model in the Czech Republic. The practical part of the work focused on summarizing and evaluating information concerning the use of Cochem practice obtained from a questionnaire survey of Department of Social and Legal Protection of Children employees. This information is further analysed and provides answers to the research questions which are discussed at the end.
|
|
|
Cochem Practice in the Childcare System
LANGOVÁ, Jana
The work is focused on the topic "Cochem practice in the child care system", ie. to the system of adjustment of care and nutrition for minors and the use of elements of one of the approaches. The aim of this work is to find out what are the differences between Cochem practice and the current system of decision-making on child care. In the diploma thesis, we first focused on the institute of family, parenthood and rights and obligations. In the event of a parental conflict, who and how is involved in it, which entities are involved in resolving it or may be involved. We approached the possibilities of an amicable solution and focused in more detail on the Cochem practice, where we compared this approach with a model common in our country and legally based. Cochem practice is based on four basic principles. It is about resolving a dispute between parents as quickly as possible, maintaining parental responsibility for the child for both parents, preferences for parental agreement, if necessary with the help of experts within a multidisciplinary team. We have chosen a qualitative form of research to meet the goals. For the purposes of the research, the method of semi-structured interview was chosen. First, a preliminary research was carried out, then the research itself was carried out. To supplement, we used content analysis of the data. The research sample was selected by the Snow-ball method. and in its final form numbered 13 communication partners. Based on the evaluation of data obtained from the research, we can state that certain differences can be seen between the compared groups. Within the framework of Cochem practice, specific terms of some steps concerning the course of proceedings are elaborated in more and more detail, as well as the competences of individual actors within the framework of cooperation in a multidisciplinary team. The key is speed of proceedings to avoid unnecessary escalation of the dispute and escalation of accompanying problems. Parents are led to re-assume parental responsibility. In contrast, in the second group, the individual professions do not cooperate intensively or closely, the proceedings on the regulation of education and care for minors take a relatively long time, decisions are much more often made authoritatively. It is therefore possible to state that the aim of the work was fulfilled and the research question was answered.
|
guest ::
