|
|
The principle of Contradictority and Its Application in Criminal Proceedings
Zukalová, Jana ; Jelínek, Jiří (advisor) ; Vanduchová, Marie (referee)
The purpose of my thesis is to provide an analysis of the principle of contradictority and its application in criminal proceedings. I have decided to use the term "contradictory proceedings" even though The European Court of Human Rights that developed the concept usually uses the term "adversarial proceedings". The reason consists in the difference between adversarial proceedings as a special kind of criminal proceedings which is typical for countries within the Anglo-American legal culture and adversarial/contradictory proceedings as a wider concept of proceedings which is based on a respect for the rights of people charged with criminal offences and which can be (and actually is) used both within the Anglo-American legal system and the legal system of the countries in the continental Europe. In this sense, the correct translation into Czech language is "kontradiktorní řízení". The thesis is composed of six basic chapters. Chapters One and Two provide introduction, presenting some theoretical approaches to what contradictory proceedings could or should be. Chapter Three is subdivided into three subchapters. First two of them examine the evolution of adversarial and inquisitorial models of criminal proceedings, dealing with their similarities and differences. The third one summarizes why both of...
|
|
|
Parties to contentious proceedings
Trojan, Luděk ; Frintová, Dita (advisor) ; Kubešová, Silvia (referee)
1 Resumé This thesis deals with the topic of "Parties to contentious proceedings". The parties involved in the dispute represent the cornerstone of any civil proceedings. Without the parties, there would be no civil procedure at all. The parties, the courts and other subjects make up the basic elements of the civil proceedings. Which is also the reason why the definition of the parties have the significant impact on the entire civil procedure. The civil procedure can be defined as a body of law that sets out the procedure rules for courts, disputing parties and other subjects, while defence to breached or threatened subjective rights and lawful interests is provided. The thesis offers a scope into the historical consequences of the concept of parties to present form along with the development of civil procedure with its changes. Besides that there is description of subjects who are involved in the civil procedure. For better differentiating a proceedings of proceedings there are listed other types of civil proceedings. Especially the contentious and non-contentious proceedings. The introductory chapters for the parties address the issue of who can become a party to the proceedings and what the conditions are. The conditions include, in particular, the capacity to possess rights and duties and the capacity...
|
|
|
The principle of Contradictority and Its Application in Criminal Proceedings
Zukalová, Jana ; Jelínek, Jiří (advisor) ; Vanduchová, Marie (referee)
The purpose of my thesis is to provide an analysis of the principle of contradictority and its application in criminal proceedings. I have decided to use the term "contradictory proceedings" even though The European Court of Human Rights that developed the concept usually uses the term "adversarial proceedings". The reason consists in the difference between adversarial proceedings as a special kind of criminal proceedings which is typical for countries within the Anglo-American legal culture and adversarial/contradictory proceedings as a wider concept of proceedings which is based on a respect for the rights of people charged with criminal offences and which can be (and actually is) used both within the Anglo-American legal system and the legal system of the countries in the continental Europe. In this sense, the correct translation into Czech language is "kontradiktorní řízení". The thesis is composed of six basic chapters. Chapters One and Two provide introduction, presenting some theoretical approaches to what contradictory proceedings could or should be. Chapter Three is subdivided into three subchapters. First two of them examine the evolution of adversarial and inquisitorial models of criminal proceedings, dealing with their similarities and differences. The third one summarizes why both of...
|
guest ::
