National Repository of Grey Literature 2 records found  Search took 0.00 seconds. 
Procedure on European Order for Payment - parallels and differences in comparison with European, Czech and German law
Ranič, Radim ; Pauknerová, Monika (advisor) ; Brodec, Jan (referee)
This rigorous thesis deals with the European order for payment in terms of parallels and differences with the European, Czech and German law. On the basis of predefined criteria the work compares the European o rder for payment with the Czech payment order and the German payment order, while the relationship with other European International Private Law institutes has not escaped our attention. Due to the longer effectiveness of the European order for payment regulation we were able in this work to evaluate experience with its application and the case law. A number of identical features of payment orders have been identified in the work, such as their speed of the procedure, optionality, issue without the hearing of the opposing party and their cancellation after objections against them. Differences have also been identified, mainly in the scope of application, different use in cross-border cases, different demand on the scope of evidence in the proposal for issue, the structure of the procedure as one or a two step and different time limits for filing of objections.
Procedure on European Order for Payment - parallels and differences in comparison with European, Czech and German law
Ranič, Radim ; Pauknerová, Monika (advisor) ; Brodec, Jan (referee)
This rigorous thesis deals with the European order for payment in terms of parallels and differences with the European, Czech and German law. On the basis of predefined criteria the work compares the European o rder for payment with the Czech payment order and the German payment order, while the relationship with other European International Private Law institutes has not escaped our attention. Due to the longer effectiveness of the European order for payment regulation we were able in this work to evaluate experience with its application and the case law. A number of identical features of payment orders have been identified in the work, such as their speed of the procedure, optionality, issue without the hearing of the opposing party and their cancellation after objections against them. Differences have also been identified, mainly in the scope of application, different use in cross-border cases, different demand on the scope of evidence in the proposal for issue, the structure of the procedure as one or a two step and different time limits for filing of objections.

Interested in being notified about new results for this query?
Subscribe to the RSS feed.