|
|
The issue of the difference between the reasonable time for rest and food and the work break under the relevant provisions of Act No. 262/2006 Coll., the Labour Code, as amended, and Act No. 361/2003 Coll., the Service Relationship of Security Force Members Act, as amended
Kasal, Marek ; Hůrka, Petr (advisor) ; Tomšej, Jakub (referee)
The issue of the difference between the reasonable time for rest and food and the work break under the relevant provisions of Act No. 262/2006 Coll., the Labour Code, as amended, and Act No. 361/2003 Coll., the Service Relationship of Security Force Mem- bers Act, as amended Abstract This thesis addresses the still relevant issue - demonstrated by the ongoing disputes of employees and members of the security forces in the Czech Republic and essentially the entirety of the European Union - of whether their alleged work break, i.e. rest time, does in fact constitute working time. To defend their respective positions, each party to the dispute tries to prove why these "work breaks" do or do not constitute working time. In the context of the terminology of the Labour Code and the Service Relationship of Security Force Mem- bers Act this would mean that instead of work breaks, such employees should be provided with so-called "reasonable time for rest and food", as the work performed cannot, for various reasons, be interrupted. Those employees are accordingly entitled to remuneration for that time, precisely because it is in fact working time, hence overtime. The aim of this thesis is to explain this consideration and, above all, to support it with relevant sources. The theoretical part of the thesis focuses on...
|
guest ::
RSS feed.