|
To the Names of Pubs, Inns, Taprooms and Dives
Šipková, Milena
On the material collected for the Dictionary of Moravian nad Silesian anoikonyms, the author pays attention to the names of pubs and inns on the territory of Moravia and Silesia. In the first part of the article, she lists some frequently used common names for a pub (hospoda, hostinec, šenk, krčma, pajzl) together with their short etymologies; in the second part she sorts the collected names into semantic groups according to their motivations.
|
|
To the Names of Pubs, Inns, Taprooms and Dives
Šipková, Milena
On the material collected for the Dictionary of Moravian nad Silesian anoikonyms, the author pays attention to the names of pubs and inns on the territory of Moravia and Silesia. In the first part of the article, she lists some frequently used common names for a pub (hospoda, hostinec, šenk, krčma, pajzl) together with their short etymologies; in the second part she sorts the collected names into semantic groups according to their motivations.
|
|
Types of the dialect dictionaries
Šipková, Milena
The author characterizes some possible types of differential dialect dictionaries and draws attention to their advantages and disadvantages. In opposition to these, she places the comprehensive compilation of an extensive dialect material in the form of a dictionary: on the one hand, she points out its problems, difficulties, even risks, on the other hand, its indisputable values.
|
|
To the Names of Pubs, Inns, Taprooms and Dives
Šipková, Milena
On the material collected for the Dictionary of Moravian nad Silesian anoikonyms, the author pays attention to the names of pubs and inns on the territory of Moravia and Silesia. In the first part of the article, she lists some frequently used common names for a pub (hospoda, hostinec, šenk, krčma, pajzl) together with their short etymologies; in the second part she sorts the collected names into semantic groups according to their motivations.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Dynamism and Codification
Šipková, Milena
The author attempts a typology of the language variants. She stresses that as far as codification is concerned, apart from the langue changes of the social and territorial character especially the processes of structural character are important; within them it is necessary to distinguish especially the progressive phenomena.
|
| |