|
| |
|
|
Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis
Bunganič, Bohuš ; Zavoral, Miroslav (advisor) ; Rejchrt, Stanislav (referee) ; Urban, Ondřej (referee)
Pancreatic cancer is a malignant disease with an unfavorable prognosis. Currently, the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer is based mainly on CT, MR and EUS imaging methods, because a reliable biomarker of pancreatic cancer is not available. It is considered a success in the current clinical practice if patients suitable for surgical resection can be selected, because in this group the overall survival is slightly better than in the group where surgery is not technically possible. In the first part, the presented dissertation focuses on testing of already established imaging diagnostic methods used in common practice, i.e. EUS and EUS FNA, as well as modern examination possibilities, such as contrast endosonography, and the comparison of the accuracy of the methods used. The dominant role of the EUS FNA was confirmed. In the next phase of the work, the methodological procedure of EUS FNA collection and the preprocessing of pancreatic tissue samples was tested with regard to the quantity and quality for epigenetic examination and further testing using the prognostic role of KRAS and miR-21. It has been suggested that cytological smears are the most suitable source of biological material for DNA and miRNA analysis, where non-tumor tissue contamination is low. Although the prognostic role of KRAS is...
|
|
|
Esophageal achalasia - etiology, pathophysiology and treatment.
Vacková, Zuzana ; Martínek, Jan (advisor) ; Balihar, Karel (referee) ; Rejchrt, Stanislav (referee)
Background: Achalasia is a primary esophageal motility disorder that can be classified into three types (I-III) based on high-resolution manometry (HRM). Exact pathogenesis is unknown, but immune-mediated processes and genetic predisposition play a role, which is supported by finding of a genetic risk variant (rs28688207 insertion) in HLA-DQB1 gene that is strongly associated with achalasia. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has become a standard treatment for achalasia, but the long-term efficacy, safety and impact on esophageal physiology are not fully understood. The aims of our studies were to perform the first genotype-phenotype analysis investigating the frequency of rs28688207 accross three HRM types of achalasia, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of POEM and to assess the post-POEM esophageal motility patterns. Patients and methods: These were three retrospective studies of prospectively collected data. Genotyping of the rs2868827 insertion was performed using real-time PCR in 347 patients from Czech Republic (n = 163), Germany (n = 114), Greece (n = 70). The efficacy and safety of POEM were evaluated in 133 patients treated in our center. The post-POEM esophageal motility was assessed using the Chicago Classification in 237 patients in whom HRM was performed prior to and after POEM....
|
|
|
The role of preventive colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal neoplasia.
Vojtěchová, Gabriela ; Zavoral, Miroslav (advisor) ; Rejchrt, Stanislav (referee) ; Falt, Přemysl (referee)
Colonoscopy is used in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening either as an independent screening method (screening colonoscopy) or following a positive result of a primary screening test (eg. fecal occult blood test, FOBT). Preventive colonoscopy is the collective name for screening and FOBT+ colonoscopy. Due to the considerable variability in the detection of colorectal neoplasia between individual endoscopists, colonoscopy quality indicators were introduced. Adenoma detection rate (ADR) and polyp detection rate (PDR) are defined as the proportion of colonoscopies in which at least one adenoma (for ADR) or polyp (for PDR) was detected to the total number of colonoscopies performed. ADR is considered a key indicator of the quality of colonoscopy. Adenoma per colonoscopy (APC), defined as the total number of adenomas detected relative to the total number of colonoscopies performed, is the most accurate indicator currently available. However, APC limit values have not yet been set. Both ADR and APC are validated indicators, but their evaluation is time-consuming and personnel-intensive, which limits their use in clinical practice. The main purpose of the presented work is to simplify the monitoring of colonoscopy quality by introducing a more user-friendly indicator, which does not require histological...
|
|
| |
guest ::
