National Repository of Grey Literature 2 records found  Search took 0.00 seconds. 
Negative decisions on international protection in the light of judicial review
Hrdlička, Vladan ; Pítrová, Lenka (referee)
Negative decisions on international protection in the light of judicial review Abstract The presented work analyzes the decision-making practice of Czech courts in cases of rejected applications for international protection in the Czech Republic. It covers the decision-making paragraphs of the Czech Asylum Act so that the reader can get an idea of the functioning of the asylum system in the Czech Republic. The work aims to be practical and in many places the study of selected cases focuses on controversial moments, in which the court comes to the opposite conclusion than the administrative body. The right to asylum is enshrined in Article 43 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms and the Asylum Act is an integral part of the Czech legal system. In a detailed analysis of the merits of disputed cases, the submitted work will present the closest possible profile of an applicant for international protection, who is close in his fate to an asylum-relevant persecuted person, as well as a foreigner who is threatened with serious harm if returning to his country of origin or last permanent residence. The legal institute is always mentioned and subsequently disputes that have been intercepted by the Czech administrative courts during the review of the defendant decisions are traced to it. The selected...
Negative decisions on international protection in the light of judicial review
Hrdlička, Vladan ; Pítrová, Lenka (referee)
Negative decisions on international protection in the light of judicial review Abstract The presented work analyzes the decision-making practice of Czech courts in cases of rejected applications for international protection in the Czech Republic. It covers the decision-making paragraphs of the Czech Asylum Act so that the reader can get an idea of the functioning of the asylum system in the Czech Republic. The work aims to be practical and in many places the study of selected cases focuses on controversial moments, in which the court comes to the opposite conclusion than the administrative body. The right to asylum is enshrined in Article 43 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms and the Asylum Act is an integral part of the Czech legal system. In a detailed analysis of the merits of disputed cases, the submitted work will present the closest possible profile of an applicant for international protection, who is close in his fate to an asylum-relevant persecuted person, as well as a foreigner who is threatened with serious harm if returning to his country of origin or last permanent residence. The legal institute is always mentioned and subsequently disputes that have been intercepted by the Czech administrative courts during the review of the defendant decisions are traced to it. The selected...

See also: similar author names
1 HRDLIČKA, Vlastimil
17 HRDLIČKA, Vojtěch
3 Hrdlička, V.
17 Hrdlička, Vojtěch
5 Hrdlička, Vít
Interested in being notified about new results for this query?
Subscribe to the RSS feed.