Home > Search Results: Silvarová, Lenka
Search:
 
Search Tips :: Simple Search
Search collections:
Sort by: Display results: Output format:
National Repository of Grey Literature 2 records found  Search took 0.00 seconds. 
The analysis of the definiton of acivity roles in basic registers of public administration in the Czech Republic.
 Silvarová, Lenka ; Lechner, Tomáš (advisor) ; Pěkná, Jitka (referee)
The thesis deals with the topic of basic registers and specific agendas' activity roles that are analyzed based on a questionnaire survey. It gives the basic overview of e-Government and the basic registers of public administration as part of e-Government. Based on the questionnaire survey conducted on particular Land Register and Register offices the structure and definition of the agenda activity roles are evaluated and the thesis identifies the intensity of various activity roles use in practice. It is concluded that the activity roles of A124 agenda are defined in the way that approximately corresponds to the actual execution of the agenda and that all the roles are actually more or less in use. On the contrary, when it comes to A414 agenda, the number of reported roles is quite maximalist. The thesis reveals that some of the activity roles are not being executed in practice at all, or they are in use only at certain offices. 67 % of both A124 and A414 agenda activity roles were proved to be defined the way that fully corresponds to the actual use of these agendas. These activity roles are being used quite often.
Detailed record
How to detect favoritism at dance competitions
 Silvarová, Lenka ; Svoboda, Miroslav (advisor) ; Babin, Jan (referee)
The thesis deals with the motivation of jurors privileging some of the participants in dance competitions. It gives an overview of the dance sport and its rules, analyzes the factors that have an impact on privileging. Based on regression analysis it determines particular jurors who are not able to dismiss a connection to specific couples. Supporting analysis determines twenty-seven jurors who have different views, or prefer some couples and therefore can be suspected of favouritism. The thesis reveals that jurors, who are from the same club as couples, have a tendency to evaluate better and deviate from the average of the jurors by 0.3 to 0.4 point. It shows the significance of the "average marks of all jurors -- 2.5" and "lap of contest" variables.
Detailed record

Interested in being notified about new results for this query?
Subscribe to the RSS feed.
Digital Repository :: Search :: Submit :: Personalize :: Help
Powered by Invenio v1.1.2
Maintained by admin.invenio@techlib.cz
This site is also available in the following languages:
Česky  English