|
|
Philosophical analysis and possible interpretations of Gödel's incompleteness theorems
Arazim Dolejší, Zuzana ; Vlasáková, Marta (advisor) ; Peliš, Michal (referee)
❆❜str❛❝t ❚❤❡ ❞✐♣❧♦♠❛ t❤❡s✐s ❞❡❛❧s ✇✐t❤ ♣♦ss✐❜❧❡ ♣❤✐❧♦s♦♣❤✐❝❛❧ ❛♥❛❧②s❡s ♦❢ ●ö✲ ❞❡❧✬s ✐♥❝♦♠♣❧❡t❡♥❡ss t❤❡♦r❡♠s ❛♥❞ t❤❡✐r ✐♥t❡r♣r❡t❛t✐♦♥s ✐♥ ❞✐✛❡r❡♥t ❜r❛♥❝❤❡s♦❢♣❤✐❧♦s♦♣❤②✭♣❤❡♥♦♠❡♥♦❧♦❣②✱❛♥❛❧②t✐❝❛❧♣❤✐❧♦s♦♣❤②♦❢♠✐♥❞✱ ❑❛♥t✬s ♣❤✐❧♦s♦♣❤②✮✳ P❛rt ♦❢ t❤❡ t❤❡s✐s ✐s ❞❡❞✐❝❛t❡❞ t♦ t❤❡ ❛tt✐t✉❞❡s t♦ ♠❛t❤❡♠❛t✐❝❛❧ ❞✐s❝✐♣❧✐♥❡s ❛♥❞ t❤❡✐r ❢✉♥❞❛♠❡♥t❛❧ tr❛♥s❢♦r♠❛t✐♦♥s ❝❛✉s❡❞ ❜② r❡✈♦❧✉t✐♦♥❛r② ❞✐s❝♦✈❡r✐❡s s✉❝❤ ❛s ◆♦♥✲❊✉❝❧✐❞❡❛♥ ❣❡♦♠❡t✲ r✐❡s ❛♥❞ ✐♥❝♦♠♣❧❡t♥❡ss t❤❡♦r❡♠s✳ ❚❤❡ r❡❧❛t✐♦♥s❤✐♣ ❜❡t✇❡❡♥ t❤❡ s❡❝♦♥❞ ●ö❞❡❧✬s ✐♥❝♦♠♣❧❡t❡♥❡ss t❤❡♦r❡♠✱ ●❡♥t③❡♥✬s ❝♦♥s✐st❡♥❝② ♣r♦♦❢ ♦❢ P❡❛♥♦ ❛r✐t❤♠❡t✐❝ ❛♥❞ ❍✐❧❜❡rt✬s ♣r♦❣r❛♠♠❡ ✐s ❛❧s♦ ❞✐s❝✉ss❡❞✳
|
|
|
Philosophical analysis and possible interpretations of Gödel's incompleteness theorems
Arazim Dolejší, Zuzana ; Vlasáková, Marta (advisor) ; Peliš, Michal (referee)
❆❜str❛❝t ❚❤❡ ❞✐♣❧♦♠❛ t❤❡s✐s ❞❡❛❧s ✇✐t❤ ♣♦ss✐❜❧❡ ♣❤✐❧♦s♦♣❤✐❝❛❧ ❛♥❛❧②s❡s ♦❢ ●ö✲ ❞❡❧✬s ✐♥❝♦♠♣❧❡t❡♥❡ss t❤❡♦r❡♠s ❛♥❞ t❤❡✐r ✐♥t❡r♣r❡t❛t✐♦♥s ✐♥ ❞✐✛❡r❡♥t ❜r❛♥❝❤❡s♦❢♣❤✐❧♦s♦♣❤②✭♣❤❡♥♦♠❡♥♦❧♦❣②✱❛♥❛❧②t✐❝❛❧♣❤✐❧♦s♦♣❤②♦❢♠✐♥❞✱ ❑❛♥t✬s ♣❤✐❧♦s♦♣❤②✮✳ P❛rt ♦❢ t❤❡ t❤❡s✐s ✐s ❞❡❞✐❝❛t❡❞ t♦ t❤❡ ❛tt✐t✉❞❡s t♦ ♠❛t❤❡♠❛t✐❝❛❧ ❞✐s❝✐♣❧✐♥❡s ❛♥❞ t❤❡✐r ❢✉♥❞❛♠❡♥t❛❧ tr❛♥s❢♦r♠❛t✐♦♥s ❝❛✉s❡❞ ❜② r❡✈♦❧✉t✐♦♥❛r② ❞✐s❝♦✈❡r✐❡s s✉❝❤ ❛s ◆♦♥✲❊✉❝❧✐❞❡❛♥ ❣❡♦♠❡t✲ r✐❡s ❛♥❞ ✐♥❝♦♠♣❧❡t♥❡ss t❤❡♦r❡♠s✳ ❚❤❡ r❡❧❛t✐♦♥s❤✐♣ ❜❡t✇❡❡♥ t❤❡ s❡❝♦♥❞ ●ö❞❡❧✬s ✐♥❝♦♠♣❧❡t❡♥❡ss t❤❡♦r❡♠✱ ●❡♥t③❡♥✬s ❝♦♥s✐st❡♥❝② ♣r♦♦❢ ♦❢ P❡❛♥♦ ❛r✐t❤♠❡t✐❝ ❛♥❞ ❍✐❧❜❡rt✬s ♣r♦❣r❛♠♠❡ ✐s ❛❧s♦ ❞✐s❝✉ss❡❞✳
|
|
|
Plato's Parmenides from a logical point of view
Nalevajková, Nikola ; Vlasáková, Marta (advisor) ; Dostálová, Ludmila (referee)
The main subject of my thesis is the so called "Third Man Argument". It is an objection, which appeared already during Plato's life and was raised against Plato's Theory of forms. As a reaction to this argument, Plato wrote the dialogue Parmenides, to formulate it explicitly, together with other objections which attacked his forms that time as well. After study of the dialogue itself follows a part devoted to three different attitudes to the issue of Third Man Argument, namely by G. Vlastos, E. N. Zalta and F.J. Pelletier and at last by M. S. Cohen. On Last pages are mentioned attitudes, which see Forms as universals and sets.
|
|
|
Biography of B. Bolzano
Vlasáková, Marta
This article covers briefly not only the main biographical data of Bolzano’s life, but also the social situation of his time, and important acquaintances, who may have influenced the development of his views.
|
|
|
Bolzano´s logic
Vlasáková, Marta
A very important part of Bolzano´s work was his logic. Despite having little influence, Bolzano developed logic in a direction which later prevailed. This article is intended to throw light on some of the main features and important novelties of Bolzano´s conception of logic.
|
|
|
Bolzano's Conception of Analytic Sentences
Vlasáková, Marta
Bolzano's definition of analytic statements differs from that of Kant, but also from the definition accepted in the contemporary philosophy of logic. The aim of this article is to demonstate the role of this definition in Bolzano's conception.
|
guest ::
RSS feed.