|
|
CSSR/GDR opposition after 1968: a comparison of paths to opposition, mutual perception, plus views of the security bodies
Vilímek, Tomáš ; Kocian, Jiří (advisor) ; Bureš, Jan (referee) ; Otáhal, Milan (referee)
This thesis as submitted has been devoted to comparison of anti-regime activities in the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic (CSSR) and in the German Democratic Republic (GDR) after 1968. It does not represent a complete survey of opposition movements in the countries subjected to comparison; more likely, it should be a comparative study focused essentially to three fundamental thematic fields. Following the outline of state of contemporary research in the matter, a survey of major (principal) archive sources and, last but not least, the methodology of elaboration of this theses, the author has been focused at the issue of typology of the anti-regime activities, without aiming to expand further the typological scale with new terms, for that one seems to be rich enough already. Rather, it accents the needs of mutual interconnection of these categorisation attempts with some individual aspects of the opposition conduct. Consequently, proper attention has been devoted to the issue of social anchoring of the opposition activities, as well as to a search of key factors of transformation; of a rebirth, in fact, of social refusal into opposition as such.
|
|
|
CSSR/GDR opposition after 1968: a comparison of paths to opposition, mutual perception, plus views of the security bodies
Vilímek, Tomáš ; Kocian, Jiří (advisor) ; Bureš, Jan (referee) ; Otáhal, Milan (referee)
This thesis as submitted has been devoted to comparison of anti-regime activities in the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic (CSSR) and in the German Democratic Republic (GDR) after 1968. It does not represent a complete survey of opposition movements in the countries subjected to comparison; more likely, it should be a comparative study focused essentially to three fundamental thematic fields. Following the outline of state of contemporary research in the matter, a survey of major (principal) archive sources and, last but not least, the methodology of elaboration of this theses, the author has been focused at the issue of typology of the anti-regime activities, without aiming to expand further the typological scale with new terms, for that one seems to be rich enough already. Rather, it accents the needs of mutual interconnection of these categorisation attempts with some individual aspects of the opposition conduct. Consequently, proper attention has been devoted to the issue of social anchoring of the opposition activities, as well as to a search of key factors of transformation; of a rebirth, in fact, of social refusal into opposition as such.
|
|
|
Czechoslovak and West European student movement in the 1960's
Pažout, Jaroslav ; Rychlík, Jan (advisor) ; Trapl, Miloš (referee) ; Otáhal, Milan (referee)
Ve své disertační práci chci paralelně sledovat vývoj západoevropského a československého studentského hnutí. Jak reformní hnutí protestní hnutí na v eeskoslovensku, tak radikálně Západě představovaly reakci na levicové hluboké systémové krize, které ovšem pramenily z odlišných příčin, z různého historického vývoje. To muselo zákonitě determinovat i podoby studentských hnutí a východisek, která jejich protagonisté hledali k překonání krize. Chci se tedy dále zabývat otázkou, jak přijímali českoslovenští studenti ideové podněty radikálně levicového protestního hnutí na Západě a jeho Zajímá stoupence, ke mě též reakce kterým právě studenti často patřili. západoevropského studentského hnutí na reformní proces v Československu.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
guest ::
RSS feed.